Sebring and Hitlaw

As for the Puerto Rican hippo he can't even keep his stories
straight. A little over a year ago he was accusing me of working on the
Mandala 737 that crashed in Medan Indonesia. In this thread he inferred
that I wasn't an A&P. Also he made the statement that I have been here
in Sebring staying at my mothers for the past 10 years. Either I am an
A&P and was overseas working or I don't have a license and have been
here in Florida. That shows that he just spews this stuff to try to
stir up crap. We'll see how how he is when he isn't hiding behind a
keyboard probably a whimp and a blimp all rolled into one.

It's both of their standard procedures ,make an accusation designed to harm
someone then refuse to back it up with facts.Both zoom and jaun are poor excuses
for journalists good Journalists have facts ,names ,dates etc. not just a
comment. zoom is jelous of Laurel because she is doing so well without him .Now
that she made Captain she accomplished a lot more in the last few years then
zoom has all his life. A lot of us are very proud of her.

Mr tuff guy jaun met some RAH guys at one of the airshows and he was a mr milk
toast all polite and pleasent.Even brought his kid along to hide behind just in
case.For all his bluster and bravado on the net he was a little mouse when
meeting RAH guys face to face or should I say mano i mano? LOL!!!

No worries Frank he doesn't want to meet you face to face it's easy to be brave
from behind a keyboard. Have a nice vacation and say Hi to Mom for me .

See ya

Chuck (aka el Pollo Loco) S RAH-14/1 ret

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote in
:


It's both of their standard procedures ,make an accusation designed to
harm someone then refuse to back it up with facts.Both zoom and jaun
are poor excuses for journalists good Journalists have facts ,names
,dates etc. not just a comment. zoom is jelous of Laurel because she
is doing so well without him .Now that she made Captain she
accomplished a lot more in the last few years then zoom has all his
life. A lot of us are very proud of her.

Mr tuff guy jaun met some RAH guys at one of the airshows and he was a
mr milk toast all polite and pleasent.Even brought his kid along to
hide behind just in case.For all his bluster and bravado on the net he
was a little mouse when meeting RAH guys face to face or should I say
mano i mano? LOL!!!

No worries Frank he doesn't want to meet you face to face it's easy to
be brave from behind a keyboard. Have a nice vacation and say Hi to
Mom for me .

See ya

Chuck (aka el Pollo Loco) S RAH-14/1 ret


I'm back to check out the group after a decade of trying to get something
done, (pointless, but I had to try..:-), and I see things haven't changed
much at all.

Chuck, Ron, and a handful of others are still posting mostly on topic.
Zoom has found a new shill. The legal climate for the light aviation
community hasn't changed much. The folks who were doing interesting and
creative things still are. The only trend I've noticed is that they're
less likely to talk about it here. Blogs have entered the scene and it's
much nicer to discuss what you're doing with a closed circle of people
sharing your interests, rather than post in a more public forum. Because
there's still the same mob of self annointed experts howling that
whatever you're doing is impossible. When you demonstrate that you've
been doing it regularly and publicly for years, they switch to howling
about safety issues.

I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that
guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?

Later,
Joe

"Joe Kultgen" wrote

I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that
guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?

That's a new one to me, and I've been around here about 10 years. I may
have forgotten about it if it was way back when, but I can say with some
confidence that there has been nobody around here with that kind of claim,
in the past couple years.

You know as well as anyone that the signal to noise ratio goes up and down,
over time. I would have to say that there is a pretty high noise factor, at
the present time. There have been some interesting discussions, from time
to time. As you could imagine, there has been a fair amount of discussion
about the sport pilot and sport plane rules, with some good points being
made.

For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff. You
will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. g
--
Jim in NC

("Morgans" wrote)
For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff.
You will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. g


HEY!


Montblack

"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("Morgans" wrote)
For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff.
You will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. g


HEY!

What, hitting too close to home? GGG
--
Jim in NC

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Joe Kultgen" wrote

I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that
guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight
limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?

That's a new one to me, and I've been around here about 10 years. I may
have forgotten about it if it was way back when, but I can say with some
confidence that there has been nobody around here with that kind of claim,
in the past couple years.

You know as well as anyone that the signal to noise ratio goes up and
down, over time. I would have to say that there is a pretty high noise
factor, at the present time. There have been some interesting
discussions, from time to time. As you could imagine, there has been a
fair amount of discussion about the sport pilot and sport plane rules,
with some good points being made.

For some really interesting (not) stuff, google for treadmill takeoff.
You will see that there are still a lot of dense people around. g
--
Jim in NC


I didn't turn up much on treadmill takeoff.

"Maxwell" wrote

I didn't turn up much on treadmill takeoff.

I didn't intend to say that you, or anyone in particular participated in
that thread.
--
Jim in NC

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Maxwell" wrote

I didn't turn up much on treadmill takeoff.

I didn't intend to say that you, or anyone in particular participated in
that thread.
--
Jim in NC


Understood. I just wasn't finding anything in the search for
rec.aviation.homebuilt, it was over in piloting.

"Maxwell" wrote

Understood. I just wasn't finding anything in the search for
rec.aviation.homebuilt, it was over in piloting.

Aaah. Understood. Sorry!
--
Jim in NC

"Morgans" wrote in
:


"Joe Kultgen" wrote

I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to
that guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming
the weight limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people?

That's a new one to me, and I've been around here about 10 years. I
may have forgotten about it if it was way back when, but I can say
with some confidence that there has been nobody around here with that
kind of claim, in the past couple years.


IIRC it was back around '96 and the guy was contending that the FAA limit
of 254 pounds max empty weight made ultralights dangerously unsafe for
anyone much over the FAA standard person weight of 170. I believe he was
looking for an exemption that would let him fly his two person trainer with
a single seat. Ring any bells? I think the guy lived in Florida.

Joe