![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
I would think that the LiIon cells could be made lighter if specifically designed for aviation use. Currently they are steel jacketed AA sized. Steel might be replaced with Titanium (atomic number 22). Lithium (atomic number 3) is a light metal as is the carbon (atomic number 6) anode. The problem is not how the chemicals are contained, the problem is the weight of the chemicals themselves. There could be some minor improvement in the overall weight of the batteries, but not enough to overtake the high energy density of liquid fuels. You seem to have a firm grasp of the issue. Given: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_ion_battery Lithium ion battery Specific energy density: 150 to 200 W·h/kg (540 to 720 kJ/kg) Volumetric energy density: 250 to 530 W·h/L (900 to 1900 J/cm3) Specific power density: 300 to 1500 W/kg (@ 20 seconds [2] and 285 W·h/L) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasoline Gasoline Energy content Fuel type Megajoules/L MJ/kg BTU/US gal Premium Gasoline 32.84 43.50 131,200 Can you quantify the prospect of replacing Avgas with LiIon batteries? The key comparison is the specific energy density, since that would tell you how far you could fly, and with what load. If batteries are going to be competitive, they would have to have a weigh about the same as the liquid fuel to be competitive in aviation use. Otherwise, either useful load would drop, the range would be limited, or the aircraft would be completely impractical. To end up with a similar weight, they would need similar energy densities, multiplied by the efficiency of the prime mover. From the table provided above, the energy density of gasoline is 45 MJ/kg, and lithium batteries are 0.72, at best. A gasoline engine is perhaps 25% efficient in an aircraft, and an electric motor, with its control, would be about 90% efficient. Multiplying the two to get the required useable energy density gives: For gasoline engines: 43.5 X 0.25 = 10.88 MJ/kg For batteries: 0.72 X 0.9 = 0.65 MJ/kg Therefore, you would need a battery pack that weighed about 15 times as much as the gasoline fuel and tank to be able to perform the same amount of work. That isn't even close. Given the huge difference in weight, the prospect of using lithium ion batteries to power conventional aircraft is almost nil. Battery designers don't need a breakthrough, they would need a miracle to get the energy density to a point where it would be competitive with liquid fuel. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Contact Approach -- WX reporting | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 64 | December 22nd 06 01:43 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |