A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Multiengine Rating



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 07, 06:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Multiengine Rating


"Jim" wrote in message
...
That's the correct phraseology. Loose an engine and you'll descend to the
single engine service ceiling (density altitude). The Aztec is 6000 ft.
Plenty of MEA's out west that are higher than that.


I seem to remember that when the prototype twin Diamond came out, the SESC
was something ridiculously low, like 1800 feet. You couldn't make it over a
tree at that altitude, even in the East!

They improved that, a great bit, for the current model! g
--
Jim in NC


  #2  
Old January 15th 07, 06:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Multiengine Rating

Long time ago, the Champion Lancer had a single-engine best
rate of climb of 100 feet per minute down. Fixed gear,
fixed pitch props, a Citabria with a nose-wheel. But it did
have a Vmc and you could get a multiengine rating cheap.


"Morgans" wrote in message
...
|
| "Jim" wrote in message
| ...
| That's the correct phraseology. Loose an engine and
you'll descend to the
| single engine service ceiling (density altitude). The
Aztec is 6000 ft.
| Plenty of MEA's out west that are higher than that.
|
| I seem to remember that when the prototype twin Diamond
came out, the SESC
| was something ridiculously low, like 1800 feet. You
couldn't make it over a
| tree at that altitude, even in the East!
|
| They improved that, a great bit, for the current model!
g
| --
| Jim in NC
|
|


  #3  
Old January 15th 07, 09:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default Multiengine Rating

Jim Macklin wrote
Long time ago, the Champion Lancer had a single-engine best
rate of climb of 100 feet per minute down. Fixed gear,
fixed pitch props, a Citabria with a nose-wheel. But it did
have a Vmc and you could get a multiengine rating cheap.


Not quite, the Lancer was produced between '61-'63, the Citabria
did not appear until 1964. More like a Tri-Champ with two engines.

Bob Moore
  #4  
Old January 16th 07, 01:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Multiengine Rating

Well yes, but I thought more people would know what a
Citabria was than a Tri-Champ.


"Bob Moore" wrote in message
46.128...
| Jim Macklin wrote
| Long time ago, the Champion Lancer had a single-engine
best
| rate of climb of 100 feet per minute down. Fixed gear,
| fixed pitch props, a Citabria with a nose-wheel. But it
did
| have a Vmc and you could get a multiengine rating cheap.
|
| Not quite, the Lancer was produced between '61-'63, the
Citabria
| did not appear until 1964. More like a Tri-Champ with two
engines.
|
| Bob Moore


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commercial 250nm VFR flight - all 3 landings on the same day? Jim Macklin Piloting 39 December 20th 06 12:11 PM
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW Charlie Wolf Naval Aviation 5 May 12th 05 10:34 PM
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) Alan Pendley Instrument Flight Rules 24 December 16th 04 02:16 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Enlisted pilots John Randolph Naval Aviation 41 July 21st 03 02:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.