![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think this is the problem. I'd expect MOVER to be the first fix once the approach is loaded and I expand the approach in the flight plan view. I could then go Direct-to EWTOF quite easily and still be in proper sequence. However, the first fix is UBBEP. I replicated this behavior on the 480 sim, as well. How do I load the approach such that at least all of the fixes from the IAF (in this case MOVER) are there and ready to go? I can't seem to find a way to make this happen. I'd like it to either magically be there when the approach is loaded or at least allow me to select the applicable transition. No dice. Thanks, --Chris Mike Adams wrote: Sam Spade wrote: This handling is now approved and is no problem whatsoever with a Garmin 400 or 500. Is it with the 480? It works much the same on the 480. You have to put in the approach transition from the applicable IAF, MOVER in this case, Execute it, and then do a Direct-to EWTOF as a separate action. The only problem, mentally, is that you have to look on the chart to find the applicable transition that contains the waypoint you're looking for, rather than being able to select it directly on the approach menu. Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Quaintance wrote:
I think this is the problem. I'd expect MOVER to be the first fix once the approach is loaded and I expand the approach in the flight plan view. I could then go Direct-to EWTOF quite easily and still be in proper sequence. However, the first fix is UBBEP. I replicated this behavior on the 480 sim, as well. How do I load the approach such that at least all of the fixes from the IAF (in this case MOVER) are there and ready to go? I can't seem to find a way to make this happen. I'd like it to either magically be there when the approach is loaded or at least allow me to select the applicable transition. No dice. Huh, I get the choice of Vectors, MOVER, ISIFU, and SHOEY. Picking any other than VECTORS gives me the the EWTOF waypoint. Are you sure you selected something OTHER than vectors (and you did remember to EXEC it!) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 17, 6:08 am, Ron Natalie wrote: Huh, I get the choice of Vectors, MOVER, ISIFU, and SHOEY. Picking any other than VECTORS gives me the the EWTOF waypoint. Are you sure you selected something OTHER than vectors (and you did remember to EXEC it!) Aha! I spent some more time with the 480 simulator and seemed to have figured it out. I see now when you load the approach, the "Vectors" (top right) field can be changed at that point to (in this case) MOVER, ISIFU, and SHOEY. Just as you said! I thought that the VTF mode was selected after the approach was loaded. I didn't realize you can change that before it's loaded. Thanks for the clues, Ron! Now, a follow on question has surfaced. My flight plan in the 480 was merely KRHV to KSNS with no other waypoints. This was actually my clearance (radar vectors, direct). Now, in the sim, when I properly load the approach with MOVER as a starting point, I get a discontinuity. The flight plan, in it's XPND form, is KRHV, discontinuity, (MOVER), and then the GPS13 approach commencing with EWTOF. So, as a solution, I can select the discontinuity and clear it. Then, EXEC the flight plan and things magically work and I am headed Direct MOVER. Select Direct EWTOF and I am in business. It seems a little ugly to me, though. Is there a more elegant solution? Especially bearing in mind that I am briefly headed Direct MOVER even though that's not my clearance. Thanks for the help! --Chris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Quaintance wrote:
Now, a follow on question has surfaced. My flight plan in the 480 was merely KRHV to KSNS with no other waypoints. This was actually my clearance (radar vectors, direct). I'm confused if you weren't cleared to EWTOF I'd just start out going direct KSNS and not load an approach until I was cleared for it (how do you know what you are going to get?). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Quaintance wrote:
Now, a follow on question has surfaced. My flight plan in the 480 was merely KRHV to KSNS with no other waypoints. This was actually my clearance (radar vectors, direct). Now, in the sim, when I properly load the approach with MOVER as a starting point, I get a discontinuity. The flight plan, in it's XPND form, is KRHV, discontinuity, (MOVER), and then the GPS13 approach commencing with EWTOF. So, as a solution, I can select the discontinuity and clear it. There's no need to clear the discontinuity. Just select EWTOF from the flight plan and go direct. Then, EXEC the flight plan and things magically work and I am headed Direct MOVER. Select Direct EWTOF and I am in business. It seems a little ugly to me, though. Is there a more elegant solution? Especially bearing in mind that I am briefly headed Direct MOVER even though that's not my clearance. There's no need to ever be direct MOVER. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Butler wrote: There's no need to clear the discontinuity. Just select EWTOF from the flight plan and go direct. snip Ok, again after more fiddling, you are correct. I was able to do that just now, although I swear I couldn't make it happen a couple of hours ago. It doesn't get rid of the discontinuity that is automatically inserted, but it does bypass it! Interestingly enough, I checked out the 530 behavior and it doesn't add the discontinuity. Problem solved. I guess. To echo comments that Dave J. made, I think the interfaces to these things suck! I'm also in my early 30's, used to make my living in high tech, and am fairly computer savvy. I am amazed at how poor the interface design is. I'm just happy that I grew up (not matured!) with exposure to computers. Trying to help my sexagenarian uncle wrap his brain around the 530/STEC/GPSS system in his Twin Commanche seems like a large task! He's back to flying from taking a 20 year layoff and the flying is the easy part. The automation/avionics are more difficult by a long shot, but he's doing pretty good thus far. Cheers, --Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R172K Approach Configuration | facpi | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | January 5th 07 03:58 PM |
RNAV vectors | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 74 | December 26th 06 10:31 PM |
Trust those Instruments.... Trust those Instruments..... | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | May 2nd 06 03:54 PM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |