A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Commencing a GPS approach from a fix other than the FAF



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 07, 08:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Chris Quaintance
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Commencing a GPS approach from a fix other than the FAF


I think this is the problem. I'd expect MOVER to be the first fix once
the approach is loaded and I expand the approach in the flight plan
view. I could then go Direct-to EWTOF quite easily and still be in
proper sequence. However, the first fix is UBBEP. I replicated this
behavior on the 480 sim, as well.

How do I load the approach such that at least all of the fixes from the
IAF (in this case MOVER) are there and ready to go? I can't seem to
find a way to make this happen. I'd like it to either magically be
there when the approach is loaded or at least allow me to select the
applicable transition. No dice.

Thanks,
--Chris


Mike Adams wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:
This handling is now approved and is no problem whatsoever with a Garmin
400 or 500.
Is it with the 480?

It works much the same on the 480. You have to put in the approach transition from the applicable IAF,
MOVER in this case, Execute it, and then do a Direct-to EWTOF as a separate action. The only
problem, mentally, is that you have to look on the chart to find the applicable transition that contains the
waypoint you're looking for, rather than being able to select it directly on the approach menu.

Mike


  #2  
Old January 17th 07, 02:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Commencing a GPS approach from a fix other than the FAF

Chris Quaintance wrote:
I think this is the problem. I'd expect MOVER to be the first fix once
the approach is loaded and I expand the approach in the flight plan
view. I could then go Direct-to EWTOF quite easily and still be in
proper sequence. However, the first fix is UBBEP. I replicated this
behavior on the 480 sim, as well.

How do I load the approach such that at least all of the fixes from the
IAF (in this case MOVER) are there and ready to go? I can't seem to
find a way to make this happen. I'd like it to either magically be
there when the approach is loaded or at least allow me to select the
applicable transition. No dice.


Huh, I get the choice of Vectors, MOVER, ISIFU, and SHOEY. Picking
any other than VECTORS gives me the the EWTOF waypoint. Are you
sure you selected something OTHER than vectors (and you did remember
to EXEC it!)
  #3  
Old January 17th 07, 10:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Chris Quaintance
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Commencing a GPS approach from a fix other than the FAF


On Jan 17, 6:08 am, Ron Natalie wrote:
Huh, I get the choice of Vectors, MOVER, ISIFU, and SHOEY. Picking
any other than VECTORS gives me the the EWTOF waypoint. Are you
sure you selected something OTHER than vectors (and you did remember
to EXEC it!)


Aha! I spent some more time with the 480 simulator and seemed to have
figured it out. I see now when you load the approach, the "Vectors"
(top right) field can be changed at that point to (in this case) MOVER,
ISIFU, and SHOEY. Just as you said! I thought that the VTF mode was
selected after the approach was loaded. I didn't realize you can
change that before it's loaded. Thanks for the clues, Ron!

Now, a follow on question has surfaced. My flight plan in the 480 was
merely KRHV to KSNS with no other waypoints. This was actually my
clearance (radar vectors, direct). Now, in the sim, when I properly
load the approach with MOVER as a starting point, I get a
discontinuity. The flight plan, in it's XPND form, is KRHV,
discontinuity, (MOVER), and then the GPS13 approach commencing with
EWTOF. So, as a solution, I can select the discontinuity and clear it.
Then, EXEC the flight plan and things magically work and I am headed
Direct MOVER. Select Direct EWTOF and I am in business. It seems a
little ugly to me, though. Is there a more elegant solution?
Especially bearing in mind that I am briefly headed Direct MOVER even
though that's not my clearance.

Thanks for the help!

--Chris

  #4  
Old January 17th 07, 10:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Commencing a GPS approach from a fix other than the FAF

Chris Quaintance wrote:

Now, a follow on question has surfaced. My flight plan in the 480 was
merely KRHV to KSNS with no other waypoints. This was actually my
clearance (radar vectors, direct).


I'm confused if you weren't cleared to EWTOF I'd just start out
going direct KSNS and not load an approach until I was cleared
for it (how do you know what you are going to get?).
  #5  
Old January 17th 07, 10:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default Commencing a GPS approach from a fix other than the FAF

Chris Quaintance wrote:

Now, a follow on question has surfaced. My flight plan in the 480 was
merely KRHV to KSNS with no other waypoints. This was actually my
clearance (radar vectors, direct). Now, in the sim, when I properly
load the approach with MOVER as a starting point, I get a
discontinuity. The flight plan, in it's XPND form, is KRHV,
discontinuity, (MOVER), and then the GPS13 approach commencing with
EWTOF. So, as a solution, I can select the discontinuity and clear it.


There's no need to clear the discontinuity. Just select EWTOF from the
flight plan and go direct.

Then, EXEC the flight plan and things magically work and I am headed
Direct MOVER. Select Direct EWTOF and I am in business. It seems a
little ugly to me, though. Is there a more elegant solution?
Especially bearing in mind that I am briefly headed Direct MOVER even
though that's not my clearance.


There's no need to ever be direct MOVER.
  #6  
Old January 17th 07, 11:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Chris Quaintance
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Commencing a GPS approach from a fix other than the FAF


Dave Butler wrote:
There's no need to clear the discontinuity. Just select EWTOF from the
flight plan and go direct.

snip

Ok, again after more fiddling, you are correct. I was able to do that
just now, although I swear I couldn't make it happen a couple of hours
ago. It doesn't get rid of the discontinuity that is automatically
inserted, but it does bypass it! Interestingly enough, I checked out
the 530 behavior and it doesn't add the discontinuity.

Problem solved. I guess.

To echo comments that Dave J. made, I think the interfaces to these
things suck! I'm also in my early 30's, used to make my living in high
tech, and am fairly computer savvy. I am amazed at how poor the
interface design is. I'm just happy that I grew up (not matured!) with
exposure to computers. Trying to help my sexagenarian uncle wrap his
brain around the 530/STEC/GPSS system in his Twin Commanche seems like
a large task! He's back to flying from taking a 20 year layoff and the
flying is the easy part. The automation/avionics are more difficult by
a long shot, but he's doing pretty good thus far.

Cheers,
--Chris

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
R172K Approach Configuration facpi Instrument Flight Rules 10 January 5th 07 03:58 PM
RNAV vectors Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 74 December 26th 06 10:31 PM
Trust those Instruments.... Trust those Instruments..... A Lieberman Instrument Flight Rules 1 May 2nd 06 03:54 PM
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 8 May 6th 04 04:19 AM
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? S. Ramirez Instrument Flight Rules 17 April 2nd 04 11:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.