A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cherokee 235 vs Trinidad vs Comanche



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 18th 07, 12:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default Cherokee 235 vs Trinidad vs Comanche



Newps wrote:
Yep, the test was when we left Schafer Maedows last July. Your leaving
from the valley floor with the mountains 4-5000 feet above you. In the
182 I would take off and then manuver next to the mountains for some
lift but would still have to circle back in the valley to get the
required altitude to head for home. With the Bo there's no circling
required. I've got about 4-500 fpm more real world climb and I'm going
30-40 mph faster in the climb as well as 50 mph faster once levelled out
burning less gas on that 470 nm round trip.


Yes, and depending on the model of the Bo, you also have anywhere from
30 to 60 more horsepower to play with.
  #2  
Old January 18th 07, 04:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Cherokee 235 vs Trinidad vs Comanche



john smith wrote:



Newps wrote:

Yep, the test was when we left Schafer Maedows last July. Your
leaving from the valley floor with the mountains 4-5000 feet above
you. In the 182 I would take off and then manuver next to the
mountains for some lift but would still have to circle back in the
valley to get the required altitude to head for home. With the Bo
there's no circling required. I've got about 4-500 fpm more real
world climb and I'm going 30-40 mph faster in the climb as well as 50
mph faster once levelled out burning less gas on that 470 nm round trip.



Yes, and depending on the model of the Bo, you also have anywhere from
30 to 60 more horsepower to play with.




Right, and also up to 50 less horsepower, depending on the model.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Narrowing it down... Comanche? Douglas Paterson Owning 18 February 26th 06 12:51 AM
Cherokee Pilots Association Fly-In Just Gets Better and Better Jay Honeck Piloting 7 August 8th 05 07:18 PM
Comanche accident averted last evening [email protected] Piloting 23 April 13th 05 10:02 AM
Cherokee National Fly-In & Convention Don Piloting 0 May 5th 04 08:14 PM
Cherokee National Fly-In & Convention Don General Aviation 0 March 20th 04 02:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.