A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

USA Today .. Positive GA Pub



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 18th 07, 11:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Tony writes:

In the United States, there are several million (at least) people who
if they wanted a $400,000 airplane could just write a check for it.


One percent, you mean? So that means that 99% of the population is
excluded from GA. It might be hard to drum up sympathy for GA in that
99%.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old January 18th 07, 11:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 312
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub


Read the damn post. I said that fraction could write a check for a
$400,000 airplane. Tell me how that excludes 99% from GA. It excludes
them from buying for cash a $400,000 airplane.




On Jan 18, 6:42 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tony writes:
In the United States, there are several million (at least) people who
if they wanted a $400,000 airplane could just write a check for it.One percent, you mean? So that means that 99% of the population is

excluded from GA. It might be hard to drum up sympathy for GA in that
99%.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.


  #3  
Old January 18th 07, 11:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Tony writes:

Read the damn post. I said that fraction could write a check for a
$400,000 airplane. Tell me how that excludes 99% from GA. It excludes
them from buying for cash a $400,000 airplane.


Try to be nice. As I've said, the majority of the population that
doesn't have access to GA, or isn't interested in it, is still a
population that can vote. If you have a poor attitude, they may
outlaw GA one day.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #4  
Old January 19th 07, 12:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Tony writes:

In the United States, there are several million (at least) people who
if they wanted a $400,000 airplane could just write a check for it.


One percent, you mean? So that means that 99% of the population is
excluded from GA. It might be hard to drum up sympathy for GA in that
99%.


99% of the population in the USA can't write a check to purchase a home
either. Does that mean that 99% of the population is excluded from home
ownership? It sure doesn't seem that way from the statistics.

GA Pilots aren't looking for sympathy. We are looking for accurate reporting.

One sim pilot seems to be looking for sympathy. Maybe it's a Sim Pilot thing.
  #5  
Old January 19th 07, 01:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Judah writes:

GA Pilots aren't looking for sympathy. We are looking for accurate reporting.


You don't necessarily want accurate reporting, if it creates the wrong
impression.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old January 19th 07, 02:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

You don't necessarily want accurate reporting, if it creates the wrong
impression.


Well, I prefer a report that accurately represents reality, and tells the
whole story. A person can take specific facts and still create an innacurate
representation of the truth.

But you know that very well.
  #7  
Old January 19th 07, 02:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Judah writes:

Well, I prefer a report that accurately represents reality, and tells the
whole story.


Even if you end up losing the ability to fly as a result?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #8  
Old January 19th 07, 02:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Even if you end up losing the ability to fly as a result?


How exactly will my ability to fly be affected by that article in USA Today?
  #9  
Old January 19th 07, 10:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

Judah writes:

How exactly will my ability to fly be affected by that article in USA Today?


Public opinion shapes public policy and legislation. If public
opinion were to turn against general aviation, GA might simply be
outlawed. The vast majority of the population would be unaffected and
wouldn't care. Similar things have happened in the past. Seemingly
positive stories about GA don't help if the average reader feels
excluded by them, and they may actually hurt by bringing a rich man's
hobby to the attention of the average person. "You mean people are
allowed to fly around freely in their own planes?? That's dangerous!"
might well be the reaction. The next step is to forbid people to fly
in their own planes, removing that dangerous minority from the air.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #10  
Old January 19th 07, 01:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 897
Default USA Today .. Positive GA Pub

In the United States, there are several million (at least) people who
if they wanted a $400,000 airplane could just write a check for it.



One percent, you mean? So that means that 99% of the population is
excluded from GA.


Only if being excluded is the same as not being able to buy a plane for
cash. I don't think they are equivalent.

Jose
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
18 Oct 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 October 19th 05 02:19 AM
I'M GOING TO DIE TODAY. ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 February 4th 04 09:44 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In Zeno Aerobatics 0 August 2nd 03 07:31 PM
The Yankee Lady Flew Today Tom Huxton Piloting 0 July 11th 03 11:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.