A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Requesting lower"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 07, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Let's say you are approaching a uncontrolled airport with overcast at 1500
ft AGL and there are VFR pilots in the pattern. Do you think that just maybe
this is why there are more than one radio in most aircraft and in virtually
all aircraft that fly IFR regularly?


I don't know the original purpose for two radios, but it cannot be
that, because there will be no VFR pilots (legally) in the pattern
with an overcast at 1500 feet.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old January 19th 07, 09:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")


Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Let's say you are approaching a uncontrolled airport with overcast at 1500
ft AGL and there are VFR pilots in the pattern. Do you think that just maybe
this is why there are more than one radio in most aircraft and in virtually
all aircraft that fly IFR regularly?


I don't know the original purpose for two radios, but it cannot be
that, because there will be no VFR pilots (legally) in the pattern
with an overcast at 1500 feet.


While 1 radio is legal ( as is no radio) its not very uncommon. When
approaching an uncontrolled field IFR any reasonable pilot will have
CTAF dialed in #2 and listening long before ATC releases him, so he
understands what is going on in the pattern.

-robert, CFII

  #3  
Old January 19th 07, 09:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")


Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Let's say you are approaching a uncontrolled airport with overcast at 1500
ft AGL and there are VFR pilots in the pattern. Do you think that just maybe
this is why there are more than one radio in most aircraft and in virtually
all aircraft that fly IFR regularly?


I don't know the original purpose for two radios, but it cannot be
that, because there will be no VFR pilots (legally) in the pattern
with an overcast at 1500 feet.


In the U.S. they'll be there and legal. At a pattern altitude less
than 1200', you're legal during the day if you stay clear of clouds.

Kev

  #4  
Old January 19th 07, 11:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Kev writes:

In the U.S. they'll be there and legal. At a pattern altitude less
than 1200', you're legal during the day if you stay clear of clouds.


Only in Class G, and at a vast number of untowered airports 1000' AGL
is still in Class E (700' floor).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #5  
Old January 20th 07, 01:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Mxsmanic wrote:
Kev writes:

In the U.S. they'll be there and legal. At a pattern altitude less
than 1200', you're legal during the day if you stay clear of clouds.


Only in Class G, and at a vast number of untowered airports 1000' AGL
is still in Class E (700' floor).


In Class E, with a typical 800'-1000' pattern, they'd still be 500'
below the aforementioned 1500' clouds, and therefore legal.

I soloed under those conditions. Thereafter I was known as "MVFR Kev"
:-)

  #6  
Old January 20th 07, 06:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Kev writes:

In Class E, with a typical 800'-1000' pattern, they'd still be 500'
below the aforementioned 1500' clouds, and therefore legal.


I suppose so. I doubt that anyone ever checks, anyway. Enforcement
is problematic if any kind of objective proof is required.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #7  
Old January 20th 07, 01:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Milen Lazarov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

On 2007-01-19, Mxsmanic wrote:
Only in Class G, and at a vast number of untowered airports 1000' AGL
is still in Class E (700' floor).


And what is the required cloud clearance in class E?
  #8  
Old January 20th 07, 06:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Milen Lazarov writes:

And what is the required cloud clearance in class E?


1000 above, 500 below when flying below 10000 MSL, and 1000 in both
directions when flying at or above 10000 MSL. So you cannot fly a
pattern at 1000 AGL in Class E if you have a ceiling of 1500.

This applies to the United States (FAR 91.155); I don't know about
other countries.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #9  
Old January 20th 07, 07:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Milen Lazarov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

On 2007-01-20, Mxsmanic wrote:

1000 above, 500 below when flying below 10000 MSL, and 1000 in both
directions when flying at or above 10000 MSL. So you cannot fly a
pattern at 1000 AGL in Class E if you have a ceiling of 1500.

This applies to the United States (FAR 91.155); I don't know about
other countries.


So if you're at 1000 AGL and the ceiling is 1500, how are you not
500 feet below the clouds? And why you cannot fly the pattern?
  #10  
Old January 21st 07, 05:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Milen Lazarov writes:

So if you're at 1000 AGL and the ceiling is 1500, how are you not
500 feet below the clouds? And why you cannot fly the pattern?


The FARs are actually ambiguous, but they say "distance from clouds
.... 1000 feet below."

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.