![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
No, I'm guessing just a lack of money and gullibility. :-) Well, gullibility anyway. Let's see...I can either buy a 60-year old single engine prop plane design, or a nice little biz jet. Gee, which should I get? D'oh! Well, it isn't quite that simple. The purchase cost is one thing, but operational costs live with you forever. Check the insurance costs for a jet vs. a Bonanza, check the recurrent training requirements for a jet vs. the single, check the fuel costs, check .... you get the picture. I'll bet the operating costs for the Jet are at least 4X more than the Bonanza and maybe even higher than that. Sometimes you pay more upfront to save later. Just as with most hybrid cars costing more to purchase, but paying you back (hopefully) with lower operating costs. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Matt Whiting wrote: I'll bet the operating costs for the Jet are at least 4X more than the Bonanza and maybe even higher than that. 25 times more at a bare minimum. Sometimes you pay more upfront to save later. Just as with most hybrid cars costing more to purchase, but paying you back (hopefully) with lower operating costs. This is never, ever the case with a jet. A jet can save you time but will always cost more in money. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: I'll bet the operating costs for the Jet are at least 4X more than the Bonanza and maybe even higher than that. 25 times more at a bare minimum. Sometimes you pay more upfront to save later. Just as with most hybrid cars costing more to purchase, but paying you back (hopefully) with lower operating costs. This is never, ever the case with a jet. A jet can save you time but will always cost more in money. That was my point. Even though a new Bo may cost more than a used Jet, the Bo's lower operating costs will quickly swamp any purchase price differential. Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm sure everyone here has his fantasy of what to get if winning the lotto. If a few million bucks suddenly show up in my bank account, the most I'll get would be a single engine turboprop, a PC-12 or something like that. Even in the world of turbine, it's hard to beat the cost efficiency of single engine prop. This is never, ever the case with a jet. A jet can save you time but will always cost more in money. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Narrowing it down... Comanche? | Douglas Paterson | Owning | 18 | February 26th 06 12:51 AM |
Cherokee Pilots Association Fly-In Just Gets Better and Better | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 7 | August 8th 05 07:18 PM |
Comanche accident averted last evening | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | April 13th 05 10:02 AM |
Cherokee National Fly-In & Convention | Don | Piloting | 0 | May 5th 04 08:14 PM |
Cherokee National Fly-In & Convention | Don | General Aviation | 0 | March 20th 04 02:15 AM |