|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 23rd 07, 10:25 PM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
Safety pilot "flight time"
On 01/22/07 15:00, Jim Macklin wrote:
Thank you for posting the letter. I agrees with my position IMHO. Are you saying that you believe the letter posted by Bob supports your position? The question is whether you note the time as 61.51 or 1.1 time. What? You don't log 1.1 time. You either log your time as PIC or you don't. 1.1 describes the definition of PIC. 61.51 describes the requirements for logging your time as PIC (among other things). Oh my! I wonder what cases have gone through in the past 14 years to further clarify the issue? -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
| Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
| ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Hybrid Mode
