Multiengine Rating

**Mxsmanic** · January 24th 07, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting

John Theune writes:

Actually not it was never shown to be bugs in the software.

The software rebooted the system. The software was standard. It
contained bugs. Bugs are dangerous in safety-of-life systems.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

**John Theune** · January 24th 07, 10:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting

Mxsmanic wrote:
John Theune writes:

Actually not it was never shown to be bugs in the software.

The software rebooted the system. The software was standard. It
contained bugs. Bugs are dangerous in safety-of-life systems.

The software was running on hardware that had been modified outside the
scope of what the software was designed for. There were questions
raised during the initial discussion about damage to the hardware due to
the installation of other components into the panel. You have no
knowledge if there were bugs in the software or not. but then again
this line of argument is just the same as all the others you have put forth

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Commercial 250nm VFR flight - all 3 landings on the same day?	Jim Macklin	Piloting	39	December 20th 06 12:11 PM
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW	Charlie Wolf	Naval Aviation	5	May 12th 05 10:34 PM
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long)	Alan Pendley	Instrument Flight Rules	24	December 16th 04 02:16 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons	Curtl33	General Aviation	7	January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Enlisted pilots	John Randolph	Naval Aviation	41	July 21st 03 02:11 PM