![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Douglas Paterson" wrote: - Engine time. Seems simple enough--divide the time on the motor by TBO and multiply by overhaul cost ($25K, I seem to be hearing? [oops! I'm trying to join this club, better get used to the jargon: make that 25AMU ![]() better), and you can compare two different time engines. Fair enough? There is a fudge factor (totally guess work) to account for the type of time on the engine. Did the airplane sit for months and months between long flights? 300 hours in ten years isn't as good as 300 hours in 2-3 years. Also, some engines have a calendar time between overhauls. I didn't follow your whole thread, did anyone suggest you think about whether you want an airplane with a run-out engine (you overhaul it and know that you have a fresh overhaul), mid-time engine (will it really make TBO?), or fresh overhaul (was it a cheapo overhaul?)? I ended up buying (and paying for) an airplane with a low-time engine. It had about 300 hours on it, and only got to around 600 hours before a couple of cylinders cracked. - Avionics--the big one. Conventional wisdom seems to be to get the What's a soup-to-nuts panel cost, brand new, installed? Is 50AMU in the ballpark? What's your definition of soup-to-nuts? - Paint. What's a quality paint job cost? 5AMU? Around here, 10 AMU. - Interior. What's a new interior cost? 5AMU? and possibly more. Less if you do the work yourself. good luck -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Valuing similar aircraft is not straight forward, especially so if you have not flown that make and model often. Essentially, if you have decided to buy a specific model, the most important task now is to become the dreaded tyre kicker ! Go look at every aircraft that are accessible to you, no matter the asking price, that is the only way you will build the knowledge to eventually make the decision which is right for you. Test fly as many that will allow you and pay for the fuel ! Take your digital camera and photograph every bird you look at, in detail, especially the panel. Go home and study those photographs ......... build your knowledge of that model and marks of it. When you know that make and model really well, you are ready to seriously consider dumping your cash into your very own money pit. There is a lot of junk sitting on the market, you just have to know enough to make sure you don't buy one of those. When you have gone through this process you will know which aircraft represents the condition and equipment that you are prepared to pay for. You can use all the valuation aids available, but nothing will beat having sound knowledge of the condition and equipment in the aircraft on sale and their asking prices. You already know that upgrading an aircraft with new avionics, engine work, interior and exterior work is a costly exercise. And if you go that route you will need to fly that value out of your bird. The choice for me, was easier. I had lots of hours both flying and helping to maintain Piper Archers. So an Archer would become my first airplane. What should I do though ? Buy a $95,000 Archer with decent avionics, up to half time engine and good interior etc or buy an Archer with run-out engine, and more or less as it left the Piper factory in all departments at a cost of $50,000. I chose the expensive route, I bought the $50,000 bird and have spent the last 2 years having a great time fixing it up so everything is as I want it to be. I am a mechanical engine and a licensed Radio Amateur, so have good mechanical and avionic understanding. When finished I will have about $110,000 in the bird, BUT ...... ..... It now is all new firewall forward, with a top notch engine, complete Garmin 530 Stack with Dacint RSS and all new under panel and avionic wiring. The "all leather" interior cost $7,000, and stripping and painting gets done in February at $9,000 plus. I fitted new flight control cables and Knots 2U wing tips with landing lights, gap seals and wing root fairings. And a host of other upgrades to ensure the aircraft is in the very best mechanical condition. In fact most moving parts are new. I could have just overhauled the engine, and happily flown this minimum squawk clean Archer with its factory avionics for many years. But I relished the enjoyment of planning the work, negotiating the costs and getting it all done. So I cannot get back anywhere near the $110,000 that I have spent, but it is equipped with the best, it flies really nice and will look great after the paint job. Would I go this route again ? Well if I discount buying a new aircraft, yes, I think I would do it this way again I did not want a bird sitting in the hanger which had bits and pieces thrown in by a dozen different owners who never spent the cash needed to properly gut out the old and replace it all with new. I would have had to live and maintain with what they left for me. Know the model you intend to buy really well. Know the current market prices, and eventually you will make a good decision when you buy your aircraft. -- Roy Piper Archer N5804F "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "Douglas Paterson" wrote: - Engine time. Seems simple enough--divide the time on the motor by TBO and multiply by overhaul cost ($25K, I seem to be hearing? [oops! I'm trying to join this club, better get used to the jargon: make that 25AMU ![]() better), and you can compare two different time engines. Fair enough? There is a fudge factor (totally guess work) to account for the type of time on the engine. Did the airplane sit for months and months between long flights? 300 hours in ten years isn't as good as 300 hours in 2-3 years. Also, some engines have a calendar time between overhauls. I didn't follow your whole thread, did anyone suggest you think about whether you want an airplane with a run-out engine (you overhaul it and know that you have a fresh overhaul), mid-time engine (will it really make TBO?), or fresh overhaul (was it a cheapo overhaul?)? I ended up buying (and paying for) an airplane with a low-time engine. It had about 300 hours on it, and only got to around 600 hours before a couple of cylinders cracked. - Avionics--the big one. Conventional wisdom seems to be to get the What's a soup-to-nuts panel cost, brand new, installed? Is 50AMU in the ballpark? What's your definition of soup-to-nuts? - Paint. What's a quality paint job cost? 5AMU? Around here, 10 AMU. - Interior. What's a new interior cost? 5AMU? and possibly more. Less if you do the work yourself. good luck -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bob Noel wrote: and another thing... I always figured if you plan on keeping your airplane for a long time, then the benefit of fixing the way you want it outweighs the cost of the upgrades vs buying an airplane already equipped. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Film Features Newsmen on World War II Combat Gliders | Pete Brown | Soaring | 0 | June 6th 06 03:04 AM |
Garmin backing away from additional GDL-69 features for 430/530 products? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 2 | September 9th 05 11:36 PM |
New GPS Visualizer features: address mapping & GPX creation | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 0 | September 21st 04 08:33 PM |
new GPS Visualizer features: tickmarks & text entry | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 0 | April 24th 04 08:32 PM |
GPS Visualizer: new global imagery + new features | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 2 | March 18th 04 01:32 PM |