![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:58:32 -0500, bsalai wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:05:16 -0800, Mark Hansen wrote: But ... and I hadn't considered this until now... you would still log the entire flight time as "total flight time" even though the amount of time logged under PIC, SIC or both is less than the total. That's what I thought I had written. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Are you sure about logging the second in command time? YES 61.51 says: ... (f) Logging second-in-command time. A person may log second-in-command flight time only for that flight time during which that person: (1) Is qualified in accordance with the second-in-command requirements of Sec. 61.55 of this part, and occupies a crewmember station in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate; or (2) Holds the appropriate category, class, and instrument rating (if an instrument rating is required for the flight) for the aircraft being flown, and more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted. In both cases, it seems to require that the time be in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate. That isn't the case in any of the aircraft I fly as safety pilot, so, I'd say if you are not PIC, you can't log the time as SIC. Maybe you can log it as something else? Brad Reread 61.51(f)(2) carefully: "...more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft ***or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted***. 91.109(b)(1) is the regulation that *requires* a safety pilot when the pilot flying is operating the aircraft in simulated instrument flight. Hence "the regulations under which the flight is being conducted" requires more than one pilot. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:58:32 -0500, bsalai wrote: Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:05:16 -0800, Mark Hansen wrote: But ... and I hadn't considered this until now... you would still log the entire flight time as "total flight time" even though the amount of time logged under PIC, SIC or both is less than the total. That's what I thought I had written. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Are you sure about logging the second in command time? YES 61.51 says: ... (f) Logging second-in-command time. A person may log second-in-command flight time only for that flight time during which that person: (1) Is qualified in accordance with the second-in-command requirements of Sec. 61.55 of this part, and occupies a crewmember station in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate; or (2) Holds the appropriate category, class, and instrument rating (if an instrument rating is required for the flight) for the aircraft being flown, and more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted. In both cases, it seems to require that the time be in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate. That isn't the case in any of the aircraft I fly as safety pilot, so, I'd say if you are not PIC, you can't log the time as SIC. Maybe you can log it as something else? Brad Reread 61.51(f)(2) carefully: "...more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft ***or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted***. 91.109(b)(1) is the regulation that *requires* a safety pilot when the pilot flying is operating the aircraft in simulated instrument flight. Hence "the regulations under which the flight is being conducted" requires more than one pilot. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Absolutely, thanks. Brad |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |