![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I agree, except that you are not allowed to log PIC during the time the kid sister is manipulating the controls, except perhaps under this legal opinion. I call baloney. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Butler" wrote in message ... I agree, except that you are not allowed to log PIC during the time the kid sister is manipulating the controls, except perhaps under this legal opinion. I call baloney. You call what baloney? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Prevost wrote:
"Dave Butler" wrote in message ... I agree, except that you are not allowed to log PIC during the time the kid sister is manipulating the controls, except perhaps under this legal opinion. I call baloney. You call what baloney? That one is not allowed to log PIC during the time the kid sister is manipulating the controls. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/30/07 07:36, Dave Butler wrote:
Stan Prevost wrote: "Dave Butler" wrote in message ... I agree, except that you are not allowed to log PIC during the time the kid sister is manipulating the controls, except perhaps under this legal opinion. I call baloney. You call what baloney? That one is not allowed to log PIC during the time the kid sister is manipulating the controls. The regs are specific in this area, and I agree with Stan. Here they a (e) Logging pilot-in-command flight time. (1) A sport, recreational, private, or commercial pilot may log pilot-in-command time only for that flight time during which that person (i) Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated or has privileges; (ii) Is the sole occupant of the aircraft; or (iii) Except for a recreational pilot, is acting as pilot in command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is conducted. When our Pilot is letting his kid sister operate the controls and fly the airplane, which one of those three apply to the pilot? He's not the sole manipulator of the controls, he's not the sole occupant, and the aircraft does not require more than one pilot. Now I would guess that every pilot in this situation is logging the time as PIC, but the statement was that a strict interpretation of the regulations do not allow it (except that now, the legal opinion provides a way, in that it allows for an exception if the person operating the controls is not "rated"). -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Hansen" wrote in message Now I would guess that every pilot in this situation is logging the time as PIC, but the statement was that a strict interpretation of the regulations do not allow it (except that now, the legal opinion provides a way, in that it allows for an exception if the person operating the controls is not "rated"). Maybe allows a way. The continued effectivity of the opinion would have to be researched. As Dr. Rosenfeld said, it is old. Part 61 underwent a major rewrite since that opinion, and the basis for the opinion may have changed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/30/07 07:58, Stan Prevost wrote:
"Mark Hansen" wrote in message Now I would guess that every pilot in this situation is logging the time as PIC, but the statement was that a strict interpretation of the regulations do not allow it (except that now, the legal opinion provides a way, in that it allows for an exception if the person operating the controls is not "rated"). Maybe allows a way. The continued effectivity of the opinion would have to be researched. As Dr. Rosenfeld said, it is old. Part 61 underwent a major rewrite since that opinion, and the basis for the opinion may have changed. I wonder if when they go about re-writing a section of the FAR if they don't consider the legal opinions that were written for the section over the years. I would think they may not want to incorporate the opinion into the FAR simply because the opinion, as written, is doing its job. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
The regs are specific in this area, and I agree with Stan. Here they a I withdraw my baloney. Thanks for the correction. DGB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |