![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote:
Know how to interpret the material from on-line sources. The key is, can you draw a crude picture of the weather [verbally or with a pencil] and then apply that to the FAR as to whether the weather, currently and forecast, will allow the operation. When I was doing my training (early 90's), I found studying the chart material very difficult, for two reasons. First, the charts they showed you in the study guides were badly reproduced, sometimes to the point of being almost unreadable. More importantly, I never saw those charts in real life. The days of walking into your local FSS were already gone, and the days of universal internet access wasn't here yet. As a result, weather for me was whatever you got on DUATs and/or by calling 1-800-WX-BRIEF, and the charts in the test prep book were completely alien. Today, it's different. Almost any airport or FBO has computer access to weather charts (in full color, on a high-resolution screen), as does every pilot from their home or office (not to mention things like The Weather Channel on TV). I usually go to http://www.weatherunderground.com/Aviation_Maps/. I couldn't tell you the official names of the various charts. I assume one of them is a "prog chart", but I couldn't tell you which, nor could I tell you how many hours in advance a prog chart is good for, or exactly what combination of data is on a prog chart. But, I can go to that web page and instantly see where the lows and fronts are, how they're going to move, what the icing situation is, what the winds are like, where there's going to be VFR weather so I know where to be thinking about alternates, etc, etc. That's what's really important. I also don't have all the little symbols memorized. If I'm not sure of something, I just click on the "Learn More About Aviation Weather Maps" link and get to the key. I second whoever it was that suggested you bring your FAR/AIM to the checkride. But, make sure you're already familiar with it. For many things, the examiner will be happy with an answer like, "I don't remember the exact details, but I know where to find it", as long as you come up quickly find the correct section in the book. If you give him a blank stare and start wandering aimlessly through the book, that won't work. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:55:21 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
"Jim Macklin" wrote: Know how to interpret the material from on-line sources. The key is, can you draw a crude picture of the weather [verbally or with a pencil] and then apply that to the FAR as to whether the weather, currently and forecast, will allow the operation. When I was doing my training (early 90's), I found studying the chart material very difficult, for two reasons. First, the charts they showed you in the study guides were badly reproduced, sometimes to the point of When I took the written (on computer) they used low res *EGA* monitors. I could not read the charts as presented or even the text identifiers on those screens. Those were the only questions I missed. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/02/07 19:15, Roger wrote:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:55:21 -0500, Roy Smith wrote: "Jim Macklin" wrote: Know how to interpret the material from on-line sources. The key is, can you draw a crude picture of the weather [verbally or with a pencil] and then apply that to the FAR as to whether the weather, currently and forecast, will allow the operation. When I was doing my training (early 90's), I found studying the chart material very difficult, for two reasons. First, the charts they showed you in the study guides were badly reproduced, sometimes to the point of When I took the written (on computer) they used low res *EGA* monitors. I could not read the charts as presented or even the text identifiers on those screens. Those were the only questions I missed. I took my tests on computer as well, but was provided with the associated booklet which contained all the graphics. This was in 2004/5. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Prepping for IR checkride - questions | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 25 | January 3rd 05 03:59 AM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |