A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 2nd 07, 10:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?


"xerj" wrote

I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss. I
mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you go
up.


Why the preoccupation with IAS?

At around 6,000 feet, the power of a non turbo piston engine is around 75%.
As you go higher, the power drops off, but the true air speed goes up.

Who cares about IAS? The question was does it take more power to go faster,
right? Any non pilot will think faster means true airspeed, not indicated.
--
Jim in NC

  #2  
Old February 2nd 07, 11:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

Who cares about IAS? The question was does it take more power to go
faster, right? Any non pilot will think faster means true airspeed, not
indicated.


True, but the conversation got to how high a plane can fly. I said that
going higher did two things: limited the amount of power that an engine can
put out because of density, and that even if you had an engine that didn't
lose power, the power required goes up regardless.

Also, not that it would matter to a non-pilot, but IAS obviously matters for
keeping best range speed for instance.


  #3  
Old February 3rd 07, 12:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?


"xerj" wrote

Also, not that it would matter to a non-pilot, but IAS obviously matters
for keeping best range speed for instance.



How so?
--
Jim in NC

  #4  
Old February 3rd 07, 02:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?


Also, not that it would matter to a non-pilot, but IAS obviously matters
for keeping best range speed for instance.



How so?


Best L/D occurs at a particular angle of attack. This corresponds fairly
well to indicated airspeed.


  #5  
Old February 3rd 07, 01:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss.
I
mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you

go
up.


Why the preoccupation with IAS?

At around 6,000 feet, the power of a non turbo piston engine is around

75%.
As you go higher, the power drops off, but the true air speed goes up.

Who cares about IAS? The question was does it take more power to go

faster,
right? Any non pilot will think faster means true airspeed, not

indicated.
--

Ok, I confess, I'd rather have an angle of attack meter to correlate more
directly with the best coefficients of lift and drag independently of
current weight. But IAS and a little math based on initial weight and fuel
consumed should work well enough for us cheap-skates.

Even if you are operating at a speed other than best L/D, which seems mostly
reserved for Glider Pilots and Jet Jocks, reference to IAS is about the only
way (that I know of) to keep the theoretical discussion understandable

Peter
Cheapest of the cheap ;-))


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. Big John Home Built 6 July 13th 03 03:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.