![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Danny Deger" wrote: "Danny Deger" wrote in message ... P.S. I have a Master's in Aerospace and have worked in the industry for many years. I will admit most of my schooling and experience was with jets and rockets -- not pistons and props. But I do recall the equations and techniques to calculate engine horsepower required for various flight modes of a prop plane was VERY complex. I am CERTAIN equating thrust horsepower (thrust times velocity) to brake horse power (torque time RPM) is wrong. Anyone have an aircraft performance chart to look at the IAS for 75% power at sea level and at altitude?? I am not going to say it will be exact, but I think it will be close. Danny Deger Danny, Go back to "Airplane Performance Stability and Control," by Perkins & Hage, John Wilet & Sons, NY, London (1949). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. | Big John | Home Built | 6 | July 13th 03 03:29 PM |