![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:16:23 -0900, Scott Skylane
wrote: BDS wrote: I know that OnTop requires things like a radio stack to be plugged in in order to actually qualify as a PCATD device. If you don't have that and the other required "accessories" then you can only use it for "Personal Use" - it won't even start up in PCATD mode without them. BDS My thoughts exactly. Whatever hardware the FAA will require to meet the new reg will be far beyond what most of us have at home. For what that simulated stack costs I could fly a *lot* of hours in a high performance, complex, retract. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Tips on Getting Your Instrument Rating Sooner and at Lower Cost | Fred | Piloting | 16 | October 19th 04 07:31 AM |
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | June 10th 04 08:02 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |