![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 05:01:47 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: They'll have a bit less to do. Agreed. However, the pilots of airliners an biz jets may get a lot more to do. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B A R R Y" wrote in message ... However, the pilots of airliners an biz jets may get a lot more to do. Is that because the pilots of airliners and biz jets don't look for traffic unless it's called by ATC? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:45:58 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "B A R R Y" wrote in message .. . However, the pilots of airliners an biz jets may get a lot more to do. Is that because the pilots of airliners and biz jets don't look for traffic unless it's called by ATC? I would think they would and should look for traffic, but I'm not them. G I know you're a controller, maybe your work location has different preferences and opinions. Our local ATC reps have stated that the more traffic talking and squawking, and possibly with a rough idea of pilot intentions, the more options the controller has for managing traffic. They feel that it's much easier to slightly change to course of a spam can early on than to move around heavier, faster traffic. What's your take on that? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would say that it's because they will have to move the planes they are
talking to, since they won't be able to move the ones they're NOT talking to. mike "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message .net... "B A R R Y" wrote in message ... However, the pilots of airliners an biz jets may get a lot more to do. Is that because the pilots of airliners and biz jets don't look for traffic unless it's called by ATC? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike regish" wrote in message news ![]() I would say that it's because they will have to move the planes they are talking to, since they won't be able to move the ones they're NOT talking to. They don't have to move them, and they shouldn't move them. A traffic advisory is all that's needed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only assuming no conflict...
mike "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... They don't have to move them, and they shouldn't move them. A traffic advisory is all that's needed. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS User Fees Loom Larger! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | December 19th 06 11:33 PM |
Trouble ahead over small plane fees | AJ | Piloting | 90 | April 15th 06 01:19 PM |
What will user fees do to small towered airports | Steve Foley | Piloting | 10 | March 8th 06 03:13 PM |
GA User fees | Jose | Piloting | 48 | December 24th 05 02:12 AM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |