![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 1:37 pm, "gatt" wrote:
CNN reports that Nancy's B757 operating costs are $22,000.00 an hour. How many seats in a B757? It's Pelosi, and what B757? Can somebody identify "Nancy's B757" or demonstrate that she has ever used or even requested such at thing She did request it. She believed that the GulfStream Hastered had used was too small. If you have a newspaper you'll find the story inside. Congresspersons often get a large amount of their contributions by wooing businesses during their trips back and forth to DC. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not a Pelosi supporter, but I'll say that the politicians with help from
the news media have turned this story on it's side. I've got several news programs running here most of the time, including one on tv. It hasn't been reported much in recent hours, but I've heard it several times that what was requested was not an airplane, it was a LIST requested by a Pelosi staffer of airplanes that the government could make available to her and her staff which would be capable of making DC-CA non-stop. As Hastered's aircraft wasn't capable of a non stop flight, they requested a list of aircraft that could. On that LIST was a B757, as was a G5, and several other aircraft. I suppose they could have listed a C5. I'll be the first to admit how amazing it is that this fact has gotten lost in the media coverage and the sniping. It was clearly reported several days ago, but has not been lately. Again, I"m not supporting any of it, if it were up to me, they could all drive home on a pogo stick or a seatless unicycle. Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By way of comparison, since everybody's swingin' on "Plosi" for the very
thing: http://www.mtexpress.com/2003/03-08-...8-06murphy.htm For this last stop before going to his vacation home in Jackson, Wyo., Cheney required: a.. The Air Force's largest transport, the four-jet C-17 Globemaster, to cart two armored Cadillac limousines and three Secret Service SUVs. b.. Two military Blackhawk helicopters for over-flight security and surveillance. c.. Two Air Force-operated twin-jet luxury Gulfstream jets. d.. An estimated two dozen Secret Service agents, plus vice presidential aides. e.. Added security from the Idaho State Police, Blaine County Sheriff's Office, and Bellevue, Hailey and Ketchum police departments stationed along state Highway 75. Counting a fund-raising stop in Salt Lake City that raised $300,000 and the Bellevue reception that harvested another $175,000, the irony is that government costs of this outing undoubtedly far exceeded contributions |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gatt" wrote a.. The Air Force's largest transport, the four-jet C-17 Globemaster, to cart two armored Cadillac limousines and three Secret Service SUVs. When did they make the C-17 bigger than the C-5A? I didn't know that it was due for and up-sizing. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... : : "gatt" wrote : : a.. The Air Force's largest transport, the four-jet C-17 Globemaster, to : cart two armored Cadillac limousines and three Secret Service SUVs. : : When did they make the C-17 bigger than the C-5A? I didn't know that it was : due for and up-sizing. : -- : Jim in NC : Just another example of the crap that is written up as 'facts' in the media... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"gatt" wrote: By way of comparison, since everybody's swingin' on "Plosi" for the very thing: http://www.mtexpress.com/2003/03-08-...8-06murphy.htm For this last stop before going to his vacation home in Jackson, Wyo., Cheney required: the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from la-la land doesn't rate the same protection. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Noel writes:
the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from la-la land doesn't rate the same protection. Neither does the Vice President. Most public personalities are overprotected today, for reasons of prestige and power rather than any legitimate concerns for security. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Bob Noel said:
the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from la-la land doesn't rate the same protection. The Speaker of the House is next in the line of succession after the VP. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ "Man in the tower, this is the man in the bird, I'm ready to go, so give me the word." "Man in the bird, this is the man in the tower, you sound funny, delay's an hour." - Rod Machado |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin writes:
The Speaker of the House is next in the line of succession after the VP. Almost everyone in Washington is in the line of succession at some point. That doesn't mean that extraordinarily lengths are justified to protect them. Nobody even knows what the Speaker of the House does; the chances of anything happening to her are nil. In the United States, the security risks to a public figure are in direct proportion to the media coverage that would result if anything happened to them. Would-be assassins choose their targets based on the media attention they're likely to receive if they succeed in killing them, not based on the actual function or real-world importance of the target. This is why Paris Hilton would probably be a more tempting target than the governors of most States. This is also why the Vice President is pretty much a non-target (to say nothing of the Speaker of the House). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Paul Tomblin) wrote: the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from la-la land doesn't rate the same protection. The Speaker of the House is next in the line of succession after the VP. and doesn't rate the same protection as the VP. Perhaps it would be clearer if I said "doesn't rate the same amount of protection" Note I didn't say the Speaker of the House doesn't rate ANY protection. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|