A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Plosi One



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 07, 10:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Plosi One

On Feb 9, 1:37 pm, "gatt" wrote:
CNN reports that Nancy's B757 operating costs are $22,000.00 an hour.


How many seats in a B757?


It's Pelosi, and what B757? Can somebody identify "Nancy's B757" or
demonstrate that she has ever used or even requested such at thing


She did request it. She believed that the GulfStream Hastered had used
was too small. If you have a newspaper you'll find the story inside.
Congresspersons often get a large amount of their contributions by
wooing businesses during their trips back and forth to DC.

-Robert

  #2  
Old February 9th 07, 10:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 42
Default Plosi One

I'm not a Pelosi supporter, but I'll say that the politicians with help from
the news media have turned this story on it's side. I've got several news
programs running here most of the time, including one on tv. It hasn't been
reported much in recent hours, but I've heard it several times that what was
requested was not an airplane, it was a LIST requested by a Pelosi staffer
of airplanes that the government could make available to her and her staff
which would be capable of making DC-CA non-stop. As Hastered's aircraft
wasn't capable of a non stop flight, they requested a list of aircraft that
could. On that LIST was a B757, as was a G5, and several other aircraft. I
suppose they could have listed a C5.

I'll be the first to admit how amazing it is that this fact has gotten lost
in the media coverage and the sniping. It was clearly reported several days
ago, but has not been lately. Again, I"m not supporting any of it, if it
were up to me, they could all drive home on a pogo stick or a seatless
unicycle.

Jim


  #3  
Old February 10th 07, 12:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Plosi One

By way of comparison, since everybody's swingin' on "Plosi" for the very
thing:

http://www.mtexpress.com/2003/03-08-...8-06murphy.htm

For this last stop before going to his vacation home in Jackson, Wyo.,
Cheney required:

a.. The Air Force's largest transport, the four-jet C-17 Globemaster, to
cart two armored Cadillac limousines and three Secret Service SUVs.


b.. Two military Blackhawk helicopters for over-flight security and
surveillance.


c.. Two Air Force-operated twin-jet luxury Gulfstream jets.


d.. An estimated two dozen Secret Service agents, plus vice presidential
aides.


e.. Added security from the Idaho State Police, Blaine County Sheriff's
Office, and Bellevue, Hailey and Ketchum police departments stationed along
state Highway 75.
Counting a fund-raising stop in Salt Lake City that raised $300,000 and the
Bellevue reception that harvested another $175,000, the irony is that
government costs of this outing undoubtedly far exceeded contributions


  #4  
Old February 10th 07, 01:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default Plosi One


"gatt" wrote

a.. The Air Force's largest transport, the four-jet C-17 Globemaster, to
cart two armored Cadillac limousines and three Secret Service SUVs.


When did they make the C-17 bigger than the C-5A? I didn't know that it was
due for and up-sizing.
--
Jim in NC

  #5  
Old February 10th 07, 02:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Plosi One


"Morgans" wrote in message ...
:
: "gatt" wrote
:
: a.. The Air Force's largest transport, the four-jet C-17 Globemaster, to
: cart two armored Cadillac limousines and three Secret Service SUVs.
:
: When did they make the C-17 bigger than the C-5A? I didn't know that it was
: due for and up-sizing.
: --
: Jim in NC
:

Just another example of the crap that is written up as 'facts' in the media...


  #6  
Old February 10th 07, 03:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Plosi One

In article ,
"gatt" wrote:

By way of comparison, since everybody's swingin' on "Plosi" for the very
thing:

http://www.mtexpress.com/2003/03-08-...8-06murphy.htm

For this last stop before going to his vacation home in Jackson, Wyo.,
Cheney required:


the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from
la-la land doesn't rate the same protection.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #7  
Old February 10th 07, 03:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Plosi One

Bob Noel writes:

the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from
la-la land doesn't rate the same protection.


Neither does the Vice President. Most public personalities are overprotected
today, for reasons of prestige and power rather than any legitimate concerns
for security.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #8  
Old February 10th 07, 04:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 690
Default Plosi One

In a previous article, Bob Noel said:
the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from
la-la land doesn't rate the same protection.


The Speaker of the House is next in the line of succession after the VP.


--
Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/
"Man in the tower, this is the man in the bird, I'm ready to go, so give me
the word." "Man in the bird, this is the man in the tower, you sound funny,
delay's an hour." - Rod Machado
  #9  
Old February 10th 07, 04:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Plosi One

Paul Tomblin writes:

The Speaker of the House is next in the line of succession after the VP.


Almost everyone in Washington is in the line of succession at some point.
That doesn't mean that extraordinarily lengths are justified to protect them.
Nobody even knows what the Speaker of the House does; the chances of anything
happening to her are nil.

In the United States, the security risks to a public figure are in direct
proportion to the media coverage that would result if anything happened to
them. Would-be assassins choose their targets based on the media attention
they're likely to receive if they succeed in killing them, not based on the
actual function or real-world importance of the target. This is why Paris
Hilton would probably be a more tempting target than the governors of most
States. This is also why the Vice President is pretty much a non-target (to
say nothing of the Speaker of the House).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #10  
Old February 10th 07, 04:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Plosi One

In article ,
(Paul Tomblin) wrote:

the VP has secret service protection. Some stupid congresscritter from
la-la land doesn't rate the same protection.


The Speaker of the House is next in the line of succession after the VP.


and doesn't rate the same protection as the VP. Perhaps it would be
clearer if I said "doesn't rate the same amount of protection"

Note I didn't say the Speaker of the House doesn't rate ANY protection.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.