![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Many non combat aircraft get shot at. It is shooting back thay makes them combat aircraft. Paratroop laden transports could shoot back. |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: #1 Piston Fighter was British Many non combat aircraft get shot at. It is shooting back thay makes them combat aircraft. So a Mosquito bombing Berlin is not a combat aircraft but a Ju-52 armed with couple of machine guns is ! How bizarre Keith |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: #1 Piston Fighter was British
From: Cub Driver Date: 7/10/03 2:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: Many non combat aircraft get shot at. It is shooting back thay makes them combat aircraft. Thank you, Art. Very succiently stated. There is a great confusion here between what is dangerous and what is combat, never mind what is a combat aircraft. all the best -- Dan Ford email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9 And of of course carrying a bombload is the equivalent of "shooting back". Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: #1 Piston Fighter was British
From: "Keith Willshaw" Date: 7/9/03 11:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: #1 Piston Fighter was British Many non combat aircraft get shot at. It is shooting back thay makes them combat aircraft. So a Mosquito bombing Berlin is not a combat aircraft but a Ju-52 armed with couple of machine guns is ! How bizarre Keith Not bizarre at all. Carrying a bombload is the same as "shooitng back" The ability to harm the enemy is the active criteria. Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote Carrying a bombload is the same as "shooitng back" The ability to harm the enemy is the active criteria. Nothing short of nuclear weapons harms the enemy as much as troops on the ground. Are you under the impression that D-Day is remembered because of the interdiction missions flown? Most people attribute its historical importance to the troops landed, including those inserted by air. Which brings us full-circle: The Ninth AF was led into combat by a transport unit. |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Many non combat aircraft get shot at. It is shooting back thay makes them combat aircraft. So a Mosquito B. IV is a non-combat aircraft, because it cannot shoot? C-47 = non-combat? but a miserably-armed Ju 52/3m = combat a/c? I would think that if you sent an aircraft into combat, that its a combat a/c. Differences of opinion, I guess. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Aircrew "Got anything on your radar, SENSO?" "Nothing but my forehead, sir." |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gordon" wrote I would think that if you sent an aircraft into combat, that its a combat a/c. That would seem to make sense, with the defining words "sent into combat" (as compared to "happened into combat accidentally.") It's difficult to believe anyone would seriously consider a C-47 (or whatever) on a mission to insert paratroops in a combat zone not a "combat aircraft." From the Air Force News Agency: "On 6 Jun 44, [Captain Vito] Pedone and Lieutenant Colonel Joel Crouch, led the tactical beginning for the liberation of Europe. Their mission was to cross the enemy coast on the west shore of the Cherbourg Peninsula, France at 0006 hours on 6 Jun. At 0016 hours, their C-47 dropped 18 paratroopers on Normandy beach." Only "combat aircraft" fly tactical missions, IMO. |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Not bizarre at all. Carrying a bombload is the same as "shooitng back" The ability to harm the enemy is the active criteria. Delivering armed paratroops fits that criterion. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Funny I saw no transports ahead of me that morning. They must have been quite far in front then. |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , ArtKramr
writes From: (Harry Andreas) I just watched the PBS show on D-day last night. It showed fleets of DC-3s carrying paras over occupied France. Each aircraft full of weapons and combat troops. I don't know if that makes them combat aircraft, but if I was in the left seat getting shot at, I'd probably think so. Many non combat aircraft get shot at. It is shooting back thay makes them combat aircraft. A lot of British Dakotas had VGO machineguns in the windows - does that make them combat aircraft? -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1990 "Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18" Fighter Jet Book | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 8th 05 09:06 AM |
Fighter Ultralight | Kevin Berlyn | Home Built | 0 | January 15th 05 10:24 AM |
Fighter Ultralight Website | Kevin Berlyn | Home Built | 0 | December 27th 04 10:11 AM |
FS: 1990 "Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18" Fighter Jet Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 4th 03 05:38 AM |
FS: 1990 "Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18" Fighter Jet Book | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 15th 03 04:56 AM |