ZZZooommm rant latest

"Jez" wrote in message
news

1) Chuck Slusarczyk seems to have consistently told the truth, even when
it
has been an admission that he has settled law suits for fairly large sums
of
money, which could reasonably be expected to cause a certain amount of
embarrassment. Despite many attempts to catch Chuck out in a lie, no-one
seems to have succeeded.

You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree.

It is impossible to believe the amount of energy going into this kind of
thing!!! I could build a house with the time and energy spent in flaming
each other in this newsgroup. What does everyone get out of this excercise?
What is the purpose or goal behind it?? I'm really curious.
Stu Fields
"Juan E Jimenez" wrote in message
news:y_t6b.278017$cF.86657@rwcrnsc53...

"Jez" wrote in message
news

1) Chuck Slusarczyk seems to have consistently told the truth, even when
it
has been an admission that he has settled law suits for fairly large
sums
of
money, which could reasonably be expected to cause a certain amount of
embarrassment. Despite many attempts to catch Chuck out in a lie,
no-one
seems to have succeeded.

You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree.

Stu Fields wrote:

It is impossible to believe the amount of energy going into this kind of
thing!!! I could build a house with the time and energy spent in flaming
each other in this newsgroup. What does everyone get out of this excercise?
What is the purpose or goal behind it?? I'm really curious.

To educate the uneducated as to the type of person the zoomer really is?

Warren & Nancy wrote:

To educate the uneducated as to the type of person the zoomer really is?

So the next time that Bill Phillips goes of on a tangent in this group
we can depend on you to step forward and educate the uneducated
as to what type of person Bill really is....????????????????

On 07 Sep 2003 03:21 PM, Bernie the Bunion posted the following:
Warren & Nancy wrote:

To educate the uneducated as to the type of person the zoomer really
is?

So the next time that Bill Phillips goes of on a tangent in this group
we can depend on you to step forward and educate the uneducated
as to what type of person Bill really is....????????????????

The difference is that it is generally pretty easy to tell what type of
person Bill is just from reading a few of his posts. Zoom, on the other
hand, is holding himself out as an unbiased source of information, and
because he is a talented liar, he gets away with it. Many of his
detractors began by supporting him, and only became aware of the truth
over time.

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins-
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

In article , Del Rawlins
writes:


So the next time that Bill Phillips goes of on a tangent in this group
we can depend on you to step forward and educate the uneducated
as to what type of person Bill really is....????????????????

The difference is that it is generally pretty easy to tell what type of
person Bill is just from reading a few of his posts. Zoom, on the other
hand, is holding himself out as an unbiased source of information, and
because he is a talented liar, he gets away with it. Many of his
detractors began by supporting him, and only became aware of the truth
over time.



Way too many of us I am ashamed to say!


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

"Stu Fields" wrote in message
...
It is impossible to believe the amount of energy going into this
kind of
thing!!! I could build a house with the time and energy spent in
flaming
each other in this newsgroup. What does everyone get out of this
excercise?
What is the purpose or goal behind it?? I'm really curious.

Basically they have run out of anything useful to write or say so
they have reviewed all that has been said in the past, now they are
just bitching about it. Being old their memory about what really
happened is fadeing a little.
--

..
--
Cheers,
Jonathan Lowe
whatever at antispam dot net
No email address given because of spam.
Antispam trap in place



Stu Fields
"Juan E Jimenez" wrote in message
news:y_t6b.278017$cF.86657@rwcrnsc53...

"Jez" wrote in message
news

1) Chuck Slusarczyk seems to have consistently told the truth,
even when
it
has been an admission that he has settled law suits for fairly
large
sums
of
money, which could reasonably be expected to cause a certain
amount of
embarrassment. Despite many attempts to catch Chuck out in a
lie,
no-one
seems to have succeeded.

You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree.

In article ,
says...

It is impossible to believe the amount of energy going into this kind
of
thing!!! I could build a house with the time and energy spent in flam
ing
each other in this newsgroup. What does everyone get out of this exce
rcise?
What is the purpose or goal behind it?? I'm really curious.
Stu Fields


Justice, fair play, ethics and a host of other words along those lines
come to mind.

On one hand you have a businessman who has spent well over 20 years
building a reputation for honesty and integrity. Along the way he has
recieved numerous awards from the aviation community. He has earned
the respect of that community and the loyality of his customers. Of
course over the years he has had a few unhappy customers and law suits.
Any business will have a certain amount of that but Chuck has had far
fewer than most because he tries to do the right thing and he is
willing to publicly discuss them.

On the other hand you have an individual that has had severe mental,
financial and moral problems for a very long time. He has used the
power of his press to shamelessly extort money from some of his
advertisers. He published good articles about Chuck as long as Chuck
was an advertiser but turned on him when Chuck would not continue to
advertise ..... and Chuck is not the only one. The list of things Jim
has done reads like a bad soap opera. Take notice of the number of
people that quickly rise to defend Chuck and then look at his paid
lacky Juan posting half truths, evasions and wise cracks. Jim will not
even post himself because there are too many questions that he doesn't
want to answer. Check the Osterhaus site for some background.

This discussion belongs on this group since it is about a well known
aviation figure and a so called aviation magazine publisher. The truth
needs to come out here since it will never be published in ANN as long
as Zoom owns it.

"Juan E Jimenez" wrote in message
news:y_t6b.278017$cF.86657@rwcrnsc53...

"Jez" wrote in message
news

1) Chuck Slusarczyk seems to have consistently told the truth, even when
it
has been an admission that he has settled law suits for fairly large
sums
of
money, which could reasonably be expected to cause a certain amount of
embarrassment. Despite many attempts to catch Chuck out in a lie,
no-one
seems to have succeeded.

You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree.



Jeremy replied:

Ahhh, I see! This has nothing to do with good American values, like truth,
honesty and justice, it's really just an expression of personal hatred for
an individual.

As far as I can see, opinions dont really come into it, either something is
demonstrably true, or it's not. My original statements stand as being a
matter of public record, nothing to do with my opinion (or yours for that
matter). Jim Campbell, whether you like it or not Juan, is a proven liar.
This is not my opinion, it's fact.

Jeremy