|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 14th 07, 02:50 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
john smith wrote in news:jsmith-CBAD9C.20104813012007@news-
server.columbus.rr.com: In article , "Alan Erskine" wrote: Personally, I wouldn't replace the A-10 with the F-35 - it's the wrong aircraft all the way - too fast; too 'fragile'; payload's too small etc. Only aircraft to replace the A-10 would be a two-seat A-10. I remember back in the mid-/late 1980's, the Air Force was headed by fighter pilots who thought anything that couldn't go supersonic didn't deserve to be in the inventory. The plans were in the works to make the F-16 the new "mud" fighter. Then along came Gulf War I and the A-10 strutted its stuff. Out went the F-16 Mud Fighter idea. And now both have been cancelled. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F-35 Joint Strike Fighter | No Name | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 9th 07 11:11 PM |
| CRS VIEWS THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER | Mike | Naval Aviation | 13 | June 10th 06 12:37 AM |
| Joint Strike Fighter under attack on Capitol Hill | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 2 | March 27th 04 08:07 PM |
| Joint Strike Fighter focus sparks concern | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 09:19 PM |
Hybrid Mode
