If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
"Roger Smith" wrote in message ... The A10 was designed to deal with battles that were going to occur within close range of the bases it would be deployed in. So it's lack of speed comes out as a net advantage as long as it's armour holds out. Actually: the A-10 was designed to loiter the battleground at low level for several hours, waiting for it's prey. Nowadays it isn't so simple (unless you are the aggressor), the battle field might be far from your main bases which means that the ability to transition to the combat area quickly could outweigh the advantages of being slow enough to aim at the targets manually. The battlefield was nowhere near friendly airbases in Yugoslavia, yet the A-10 is one of the aircraft that was most suited to patrol that very same playgound, both in Bosnia and in Kosovo. In fact: it is still the aircraft of choice to patrol the skys above those territories. And don't forget battle damage; no aircraft flying can absorb the amount of damage an A-10 can survive. I don't doubt it (1) but out of interest. How many battles have A10's been in? The same battles the RAFs Tornados paid a visit: GulfWar-II (FYI: GW-I was between Iraq and Iran, and led to the Tanker War), Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Gulf War-III. I think the A-10 did FAR better in CAS than the Tornado did. How many A10's have been sold outside the US? None, although the USAF did at one point attempt to sell them abroad, when it was decided to dispose of them just before GW-II. Turkey was a likely candidate. Then GW-II happened, and the rest is history. The USAF doesn't want to sell them, even the ones stored at DM AFB are not for sale. Nobody can afford them, and even if they could, nobody is willing to buy the associated Uranium Depleted Shells that go with the main weapon: the Avenger gun. Well, maybe the RAF, but they won't buy any front line aircraft that were not (in part) invented by the Brits... (1) Actually those big fan engines have always worried me, I have always thought that stuff designed/targeted to explode just above and in front of the A10 so that the engines run through all the debris/shrapnel would be extremely effective, as a bonus for such targeting the top of an A10 is (AIUI) barely any tougher than any other combat plane. Those big fan engines are its strong point: they are relatively cheap (because derived from a commercial engine) and mounted outside the airframe to minimise damage when they blow. Their location means they are shielded mostly from the ground: the intakes by the huge wings, and the exhausts by the rudders. I think you'll hardly find an engine better protected than those of the A-10. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter | No Name | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 9th 07 11:11 PM |
CRS VIEWS THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER | Mike | Naval Aviation | 13 | June 10th 06 12:37 AM |
Joint Strike Fighter under attack on Capitol Hill | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 2 | March 27th 04 08:07 PM |
Joint Strike Fighter focus sparks concern | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 09:19 PM |