ZZZooommm rant latest

"Eric Miller" wrote in message
. net...

Just what exactly do you lose (besides the time the litigation takes)?
If you have liability insurance, you probably don't even pay an extra
dime.

Oh, I get it. The $750,000 came from thin air.

It doesn't change the fact that money changed hands, but it changes the
reason WHY.

No, it does not. A lawsuit was filed, and the defendant made the choice to
pay rather than having a judge telling him to do so.

As I said before, just because money was exchanged doesn't mean anything
about the merits of the suit.

Only if the only piece of information you look at is the delivery of the
check.

I'm sure that since the plaintiff built the UL he did NOT claim the
construction was negligent.

Ok, so you don't know the reason why the lawsuit was filed. Geez, Eric, you
could at least find out or ask. The plaintiff did not build the UL.

As I read it, he listed his past and current litigation to show he WASN'T
successfully sued.

sigh Read further back in the thread. If you're not going to read the
entire thread, you ought not be arguing points with which you haven't
bothered to familiarize yourself.

Juan

In article , "Juan E Jimenez"
writes:


Just what exactly do you lose (besides the time the litigation takes)?
If you have liability insurance, you probably don't even pay an extra
dime.

Oh, I get it. The $750,000 came from thin air.

It doesn't change the fact that money changed hands, but it changes the
reason WHY.

No, it does not. A lawsuit was filed, and the defendant made the choice to
pay rather than having a judge telling him to do so.


OR, the plaintiff decided to settle for something rather than nothing.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)