![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 11, 2:40�pm, Stewart Kissel
wrote: At 19:18 11 February 2007, Stefan wrote: Stewart Kissel schrieb: The logic here still escapes me....soaring contest organizers are to ask the FAA for a waiver...so that an activity that the vast majority of pilots do not choose to do, and consider unsafe...will be permitted? Ever seen an airshow? OH, you mean where pilots are trained and pass tests before being allowed to make aerobatic manuevers. *Where pilots may not be fatigued and dehydrated from tough 5 hour cross country flight. *Where workers on the field delineate safe areas for the public to stand. *Where airplanes are sequenced into airspace, rather then screaming in on final glider from all directions? Where airshow pilots *may* participate in regular physical fitness programs to improve their stamina? *Where the purpose of the airshow is aerobatic manuevers, not cross country competition with the need for high-g pull up at the end. Yes, I have seen several of these. *Are you stating we should categorize cross country soaring competitions as 'air shows'? Low passes look and sound cool...in an uncontrolled environment conducted by fatigued pilots, who are also going to immediately enter into the most dangerous part of the flight(landing)...I don't see your analogy fitting. Maybe we should have the airshow pilots fly arond in the sun for 5 hours before starting their routines? Do glider aerobatic competitions start by first fatiguing the pilots? Respectfully: Why don't you guys put pink skirts around your glider and have an old lady contest. You're just killing the fun. You all preach a good line with perhaps 1000' setback for launches next, bubble wrap to follow so that everyone's tush don't get scratch. After the contest you'll drive with your girlie glider down the highway at 80 mph with total disregard for the mother and her twins coming the other way. Those who want guarantees, stay home and wait, for death will arrive. More NASCAR fans die every year sitting in the stands than all the world combined from "Maximum Performance Finishes", EVER!! As tragic as the accident in UK was, the facts and statistics do not support a change in finish height. Ya, I know, say that to the widow, but one "specific type" accident over a defined time line determines trends, which in this case , there is none. The vast majority feel that MPFs are an important part of competition racing and all should maintain a watch to assure that they're done by everyone, safely. R |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vector altitude for ILS below GS intercept altitude? | M | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | May 20th 06 07:41 PM |
How safe is it, really? | June | Piloting | 227 | December 10th 04 05:01 AM |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |
Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) Standards | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | April 6th 04 03:28 AM |