![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
As a self-employed individual who lives in another fouled up state (New York), I totally share your pain. Family health insurance in these parts is about 1,300/month, unless one wants to flirt with very large deductibles - something I am currently doing. Sounds like Hillary should be in charge of the entire Unitede States seeing as how she's done such a great job with health care in New York. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:57:37 -0800, ktbr wrote
(in article ): Peter R. wrote: As a self-employed individual who lives in another fouled up state (New York), I totally share your pain. Family health insurance in these parts is about 1,300/month, unless one wants to flirt with very large deductibles - something I am currently doing. Sounds like Hillary should be in charge of the entire Unitede States seeing as how she's done such a great job with health care in New York. What has she had to do with health care in New York? Wouldn't that be the work of the governor and the state legislature? -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
Sounds like Hillary should be in charge of the entire Unitede States seeing as how she's done such a great job with health care in New York. What has she had to do with health care in New York? Wouldn't that be the work of the governor and the state legislature? 99.9% of Americans would not have been confused by my tongue in cheek comment. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kontiki wrote:
99.9% of Americans would not have been confused by my tongue in cheek comment. Perhaps, but the other 0.1% of us participate on Usenet! ;-) The following quote from an amusing scene from the Steve Martin film "Roxanne" always comes to mind when I see people surprised when they write something they intend as absurd or ironic on Usenet but is mistaken as being seriously believed by some readers: "Oh, irony! Oh no, we don't get that here. See, people ski topless here while smoking dope, so irony's not really a high priority. We haven't had any irony here since about '83, when I was the only practitioner of it. And I stopped because I was tired of being stared at." So tongue-in-cheek would work on Usenet, were it not for the occasional lunatics who post absurdities on a daily basis. So no, we don't get that here. :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
So tongue-in-cheek would work on Usenet, were it not for the occasional lunatics who post absurdities on a daily basis. So no, we don't get that here. :-) touche |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS User Fees Loom Larger! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | December 19th 06 11:33 PM |
Trouble ahead over small plane fees | AJ | Piloting | 90 | April 15th 06 01:19 PM |
What will user fees do to small towered airports | Steve Foley | Piloting | 10 | March 8th 06 03:13 PM |
GA User fees | Jose | Piloting | 48 | December 24th 05 02:12 AM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |