![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote: On Feb 12, 11:38 am, "Dan Luke" wrote: Got a demo flight in a new Skylane Saturday morning. Very nice airplane. The G1000 stuff was a bit bewildering at first but otherwise it flew just like any good 182... I got a demo ride in the SR22 and Columbia 400 last year. Like you, I was behind the curve a bit with the Avidyne & G1000 panels (and I fly an EFIS equipped Pilatus) The capabilities are pretty amazing, once you read through the (lengthy?) ops manual The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. What pwr & mixture setting? EGTs? 23" & 2300 rpm, IIRC. The mixture was 25 deg. ROP. Didn't check the EGTs. I wish I'd looked at the CHTs. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan Luke wrote: The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. What pwr & mixture setting? EGTs? 23" & 2300 rpm, IIRC. The mixture was 25 deg. ROP. Didn't check the EGTs. I wish I'd looked at the CHTs. Then something is wrong. At 23 squared that is 65% for me(IO-520) and book flow is 13 gph. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 2:53 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:
What pwr & mixture setting? EGTs? 23" & 2300 rpm, IIRC. The mixture was 25 deg. ROP. Didn't check the EGTs. I wish I'd looked at the CHTs. Dan, that EGT value looks quite close to the "red box" value that John Deakin teaches in his engine management course. Here's a link to his latest article, which covers (or reviews, actually) the EGT/CHT relationship. Good stuff here.. http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/194452-1.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Will wrote: On Feb 12, 2:53 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote: What pwr & mixture setting? EGTs? 23" & 2300 rpm, IIRC. The mixture was 25 deg. ROP. Didn't check the EGTs. I wish I'd looked at the CHTs. Dan, that EGT value looks quite close to the "red box" value that John Deakin teaches in his engine management course. Here's a link to his latest article, which covers (or reviews, actually) the EGT/CHT relationship. Good stuff here.. I believe he said the 23 squared was 65%. If so he is in the red box. You want to be richer then 100 ROP or leaner than peak EGT. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote: Will wrote: On Feb 12, 2:53 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote: What pwr & mixture setting? EGTs? 23" & 2300 rpm, IIRC. The mixture was 25 deg. ROP. Didn't check the EGTs. I wish I'd looked at the CHTs. Dan, that EGT value looks quite close to the "red box" value that John Deakin teaches in his engine management course. Here's a link to his latest article, which covers (or reviews, actually) the EGT/CHT relationship. Good stuff here.. I believe he said the 23 squared was 65%. If so he is in the red box. You want to be richer then 100 ROP or leaner than peak EGT. According to the boss of the flight school who was giving me the test flight, that is the setting achieved by using the Garmin G1000's "lean assist" feature. Also according to him, that's Cessna's SOP for the airplane. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
faster 182? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 26 | February 21st 07 02:40 PM |
Jeppesen USB Skybound Faster? | Marco Leon | Owning | 9 | September 18th 04 03:49 AM |
Looking At RAS Faster | B. Iten | Soaring | 10 | April 6th 04 10:21 PM |
Why small radius collects ice faster? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | March 25th 04 04:38 PM |
How much faster w/o slats? | [email protected] | Home Built | 7 | February 7th 04 03:47 PM |