A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Energy management



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 13th 07, 11:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kirk.stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,260
Default Energy management

On Feb 13, 1:07 pm, "Tuno" wrote:
Ian,

That's the question I posed in an earlier thread, and the answer (from
Andy) is that pilots consider it safer to bank a little extra altitude
in that last thermal before starting final glide, rather than risk
starting a final glide that's marginal, and then hitting sink, and
then finding nothing (or something very weak). This makes more sense
if you consider that thermals tend to be both stronger and farther
apart late in the day. In short it's just a risk management exercise.

I've read about some top pilots who believe in starting final glide
early (i.e., before having it), and "bumping" home, but this tactic
doesn't seem to have much of a following among the pilots I fly with.

Unlike how to cross a finish line as part of a landing pattern, the
topic of final glides has quite a bit of coverage in racing reference
materials...

~ted/2NO


To add a bit to Tuno's reply, it also depends a bit on the terrain
surrounding the finish. If there are miles of open fields surrounding
the finish, then one can (and really should) cut his final glide a bit
closer to the optimum. OTOH, at places like Turf, where the last 10
miles are totally unlandable tiger country, you better have enough
energy banked to make the finish no matter what!

Then, you need to get rid of that reserve of energy - speeding up gets
back a few of those seconds "wasted" climbing above the ideal final
glide height.

Which probably explains all those high speed finishes at Turf, eh,
Tuno? Works for me...

IMO, that's where one of the subtle traps of the "500ft at 1 mile"
finish creeps in. With all that pad, one is really tempted (and for
good racing reasons) to cut his glide real close. Then, when you get
to the line a bit too low to make it, you now have to decide if you
are going to try to pull up over it or take the penalty of a rolling
finish. Not an insurmountable decision, but it comes at the end of a
long day, you are tired, dehydrated, etc (does that sound familiar).

Bottom line - pilot in command is responsible for the safe conclusion
of the flight. Period. No excuses.

Kirk
66

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suggestion: wind energy will make gliders cheaper RichardFreytag Soaring 20 April 24th 10 06:37 AM
Under Entirely New Management, pt 3 - Ki-45-56.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 November 9th 06 01:43 PM
Energy-absorbing foam for seats ELIPPSE Home Built 7 April 8th 05 10:43 PM
WTB: Sage Model B Netto Total Energy Box November Bravo Soaring 0 March 15th 05 03:10 PM
varios not using a total energy probe Robert Soaring 20 April 25th 04 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.