![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 13, 1:07 pm, "Tuno" wrote:
Ian, That's the question I posed in an earlier thread, and the answer (from Andy) is that pilots consider it safer to bank a little extra altitude in that last thermal before starting final glide, rather than risk starting a final glide that's marginal, and then hitting sink, and then finding nothing (or something very weak). This makes more sense if you consider that thermals tend to be both stronger and farther apart late in the day. In short it's just a risk management exercise. I've read about some top pilots who believe in starting final glide early (i.e., before having it), and "bumping" home, but this tactic doesn't seem to have much of a following among the pilots I fly with. Unlike how to cross a finish line as part of a landing pattern, the topic of final glides has quite a bit of coverage in racing reference materials... ~ted/2NO To add a bit to Tuno's reply, it also depends a bit on the terrain surrounding the finish. If there are miles of open fields surrounding the finish, then one can (and really should) cut his final glide a bit closer to the optimum. OTOH, at places like Turf, where the last 10 miles are totally unlandable tiger country, you better have enough energy banked to make the finish no matter what! Then, you need to get rid of that reserve of energy - speeding up gets back a few of those seconds "wasted" climbing above the ideal final glide height. Which probably explains all those high speed finishes at Turf, eh, Tuno? Works for me... IMO, that's where one of the subtle traps of the "500ft at 1 mile" finish creeps in. With all that pad, one is really tempted (and for good racing reasons) to cut his glide real close. Then, when you get to the line a bit too low to make it, you now have to decide if you are going to try to pull up over it or take the penalty of a rolling finish. Not an insurmountable decision, but it comes at the end of a long day, you are tired, dehydrated, etc (does that sound familiar). Bottom line - pilot in command is responsible for the safe conclusion of the flight. Period. No excuses. Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Suggestion: wind energy will make gliders cheaper | RichardFreytag | Soaring | 20 | April 24th 10 06:37 AM |
Under Entirely New Management, pt 3 - Ki-45-56.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 9th 06 01:43 PM |
Energy-absorbing foam for seats | ELIPPSE | Home Built | 7 | April 8th 05 10:43 PM |
WTB: Sage Model B Netto Total Energy Box | November Bravo | Soaring | 0 | March 15th 05 03:10 PM |
varios not using a total energy probe | Robert | Soaring | 20 | April 25th 04 11:24 PM |