![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
High winds. Low temps (-15F and up) == very cold wind chill factor.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 17, 7:09 pm, Blanche wrote:
High winds. Low temps (-15F and up) == very cold wind chill factor. Common misconception. Wind chill only applies to the heat loss of animals. It does not apply to inanimate objects. The only thing wind will do to metal, glass, plastic, etc is help cool it faster to the ambient temperature. Kev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blanche" wrote in message
... High winds. Low temps (-15F and up) == very cold wind chill factor. I would think that's still balmy and calm compared to the flight levels. I dunno why they cracked. The airlines also don't know, and they have been thinking about this much longer than we have. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blanche writes:
High winds. Low temps (-15F and up) == very cold wind chill factor. Wind chill applies only to people, not things. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote: Blanche writes: High winds. Low temps (-15F and up) == very cold wind chill factor. Wind chill applies only to people, not things. Not just people. Any warm blooded animal. For that matter, any heat-generating source (object). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For that matter, any heat-generating source (object).
Are you sure about that? I thought water evaporation had a lot to do with it. Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wind chill has everything to do with how fast heat is lost from
someone at body temperature. It's widely held that the old data, that's 'wind chill', is not a very accurate measure of the effect of wind on flesh and there's some work going on for a better measure. The statement the poster made about any heat-generating object is not quite complete, I'm sure he meant to remind us that it's related to the surface temperature of the object, or at least the surface temperatture in no wind conditions. Fans in your computer are there to move air mass against hot objects to carry the heat away, they are trying to create 'wind chill' inside the computer. You can google 'convective heat loss' or 'forced air cooling' if you want to explore the subject in more depth. s Itr has ewverything to do On Feb 21, 9:33 am, Jose wrote: For that matter, any heat-generating source (object). Are you sure about that? I thought water evaporation had a lot to do with it. Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tony" wrote in message
oups.com... Wind chill has everything to do with how fast heat is lost from someone at body temperature. It's widely held that the old data, that's 'wind chill', is not a very accurate measure of the effect of wind on flesh and there's some work going on for a better measure. The statement the poster made about any heat-generating object is not quite complete, I'm sure he meant to remind us that it's related to the surface temperature of the object, or at least the surface temperatture in no wind conditions. Fans in your computer are there to move air mass against hot objects to carry the heat away, they are trying to create 'wind chill' inside the computer. You can google 'convective heat loss' or 'forced air cooling' if you want to explore the subject in more depth. Googling on "wind chill" nets a different set of results. Notice the human reference in the following from weather.gov: [[ Specifically, the new WCT index: a.. Calculates wind speed at an average height of five feet (typical height of an adult human face) based on readings from the national standard height of 33 feet (typical height of an anemometer) b.. Is based on a human face model c.. Incorporates modern heat transfer theory (heat loss from the body to its surroundings, during cold and breezy/windy days) d.. Lowers the calm wind threshold to 3 mph e.. Uses a consistent standard for skin tissue resistance f.. Assumes no impact from the sun (i.e., clear night sky). ]] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting Tony wrote:
Fans in your computer are there to move air mass against hot objects to carry the heat away, they are trying to create 'wind chill' inside the computer. You can google 'convective heat loss' or 'forced air cooling' if you want to explore the subject in more depth. That's not what wind chill is about. You need to take into account evaporative cooling, which has a significant effect. .... Alan -- Alan Gerber PP-ASEL gerber AT panix DOT com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think so.
The windchill temperature is calculated using the following formula: Windchill (ºF) = 35.74 + 0.6215T - 35.75(V^0.16) + 0.4275T(V^0.16) Whe T = Air Temperature (F) V = Wind Speed (mph) ^ = raised to a power (exponential) Windchill Temperature is only defined for temperatures at or below 50 degrees F and wind speeds above 3 mph. Bright sunshine may increase the windchill temperature by 10 to 18 degrees F. On Feb 22, 2:12 am, Alan Gerber wrote: In rec.aviation.piloting Tony wrote: Fans in your computer are there to move air mass against hot objects to carry the heat away, they are trying to create 'wind chill' inside the computer. You can google 'convective heat loss' or 'forced air cooling' if you want to explore the subject in more depth. That's not what wind chill is about. You need to take into account evaporative cooling, which has a significant effect. ... Alan -- Alan Gerber PP-ASEL gerber AT panix DOT com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS loss of signal explanation | Jay Honeck | Owning | 32 | August 8th 06 04:05 PM |
An Explanation? | Mike Kanze | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 29th 06 09:27 PM |
Is the Iowa Mumps Epidemic Affecting Airmen? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 3 | April 28th 06 04:37 AM |
Fuel injection explanation | [email protected] | Piloting | 18 | June 23rd 04 02:57 AM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |