U.S. preparations for invading Iran are complete

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:43:06 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about
potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more
years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf
oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough,
we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China
prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

I haven't implied anyting like that at all

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Well you chose to do so by saying that the left always say it's
about the oil, an obviously fallacious crack.

So, "Persian oil empire" is a right-wing crack?

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:59:36 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:43:06 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about
potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more
years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf
oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough,
we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China
prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

I haven't implied anyting like that at all

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Well you chose to do so by saying that the left always say it's
about the oil, an obviously fallacious crack.

So, "Persian oil empire" is a right-wing crack?


I have said nothing like that.

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:59:36 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:43:06 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about
potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more
years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf
oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian
oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly
enough,
we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China
prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's
disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

I haven't implied anyting like that at all

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Well you chose to do so by saying that the left always say it's
about the oil, an obviously fallacious crack.

So, "Persian oil empire" is a right-wing crack?


I have said nothing like that.

Didn't say you did.....that's the crack I was replying to though....
And I've yet to hear reasons like, to promote democracy, to
maintain stability, to remove a dictator.....from the left.

Only it's about the oil.....is what the majority on the left spew.

Mark

Mark Test wrote:

And I've yet to hear reasons like, to promote democracy

Which isn't happening. The neighborhoods of Basra which have been
controlled by militant gangs mostly live under Sharia law now.

maintain stability

You think we have created stability in Iraq?
LOL

to remove a dictator

He was *our* guy. A moderate Arab with whom we can do business.

Isn't that what gladhanding Don Rumsfailed said?

from the left

What Left? You want to talk to the Left -- c'est moi!


Only it's about the oil.....is what the majority on the left spew.


It is about the oil, fool.

http://www.juancole.com/2006/09/bush...-creation.html

Be sure to take note of the image:
http://www.juancole.com/graphics/reserves2.jpg

Mark