![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Foley writes:
Take off into the wind. There's a good chance the prevailing winds are from the west, so most take-offs would be toward the west. If the wind was from the south on Monday night, they would have taken off to the south. All of the runways at LAX are east-west. At night aircraft are directed over the water for both arrivals and departures unless there's quite a strong wind from the west. Heavies don't care much about light winds. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Steve Foley writes: Take off into the wind. There's a good chance the prevailing winds are from the west, so most take-offs would be toward the west. If the wind was from the south on Monday night, they would have taken off to the south. All of the runways at LAX are east-west. At night aircraft are directed over the water for both arrivals and departures unless there's quite a strong wind from the west. Heavies don't care much about light winds. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. Says the man who never flies and lives in France? B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BT writes:
Says the man who never flies and lives in France? Everything I said is correct, irrespective of whether or not I fly or where I live. One of the key principles of debate is that you must address the issue under discussion, not the person discussing it. The latter is considered ad hominem, and it is very bad form (not to mention very ineffective). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are from time to time correct. but frequently in error. In real
life, not formal debate, we consider the source of the information as one parameter in judging its credibility. Your standing has been badly eroded. On Feb 22, 5:49 am, Mxsmanic wrote: BT writes: Says the man who never flies and lives in France? Everything I said is correct, irrespective of whether or not I fly or where I live. One of the key principles of debate is that you must address the issue under discussion, not the person discussing it. The latter is considered ad hominem, and it is very bad form (not to mention very ineffective). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony writes:
You are from time to time correct. but frequently in error. In real life, not formal debate, we consider the source of the information as one parameter in judging its credibility. You speak only for yourself. I'm familiar with the technique of forced teaming, and it doesn't work with me. Your standing has been badly eroded. See above. In my experience, nothing does more damage to a person's position in debate than personal attacks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You blithering idiot, what I wrote was not a personal attack but a
scholarly observation. The first phrase of this reply may come close to the edge of scholarly observation, but probably does not qualify as a personal attack: Blithering "senselessly talkative", idiot "an utter fool, (in the context of aviation newsgroups see also pest and Mxmanic)". y talkative rise to the level of persnoal attackOn Feb 22, 3:15 pm, Mxsmanic wrote: Tony writes: You are from time to time correct. but frequently in error. In real life, not formal debate, we consider the source of the information as one parameter in judging its credibility. You speak only for yourself. I'm familiar with the technique of forced teaming, and it doesn't work with me. Your standing has been badly eroded. See above. In my experience, nothing does more damage to a person's position in debate than personal attacks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony writes:
You blithering idiot, what I wrote was not a personal attack but a scholarly observation. You're doing it again. The first phrase of this reply may come close to the edge of scholarly observation, but probably does not qualify as a personal attack: Blithering "senselessly talkative", idiot "an utter fool, (in the context of aviation newsgroups see also pest and Mxmanic)". When you are prepared to discuss the topic of the thread, let me know. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial Rating Question | Dane Spearing | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | July 5th 06 04:52 PM |
Commercial Rating Question | Will | Piloting | 0 | December 5th 05 12:21 AM |
Commercial Certificate question | runner_x | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | December 3rd 05 08:13 AM |
Commercial certificate question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | December 1st 05 04:32 PM |
Question Commercial pilot | BTIZ | Piloting | 7 | February 22nd 04 04:49 AM |