A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sirius and XM merger?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 23rd 07, 03:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,045
Default Sirius and XM merger?

On 2/22/2007 7:35:02 PM, "Blueskies" wrote:

I just wonder why there is not some other source of datalinked information available. I mean, why does this

have to come
in from satellites?


This type of signal offers 100% coverage within the satellite's broadcast
"footprint." What alternative did you have in mind?

--
Peter
  #2  
Old February 24th 07, 12:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Sirius and XM merger?


"Peter R." wrote in message ...
: On 2/22/2007 7:35:02 PM, "Blueskies" wrote:
:
: I just wonder why there is not some other source of datalinked information available. I mean, why does this
: have to come
: in from satellites?
:
: This type of signal offers 100% coverage within the satellite's broadcast
: "footprint." What alternative did you have in mind?
:
: --
: Peter

Like the SAS on the TV for instance, but it would be limited to the TV range. Maybe a sideband on the VOR or upload from
the radar...



  #3  
Old February 24th 07, 09:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 97
Default Sirius and XM merger?

Blueskies wrote:
"Peter R." wrote in message ...
: On 2/22/2007 7:35:02 PM, "Blueskies" wrote:
:
: I just wonder why there is not some other source of datalinked information available. I mean, why does this
: have to come
: in from satellites?
:
: This type of signal offers 100% coverage within the satellite's broadcast
: "footprint." What alternative did you have in mind?
:
: --
: Peter

Like the SAS on the TV for instance, but it would be limited to the TV range. Maybe a sideband on the VOR or upload from
the radar...





Cost of 2 sats Cost of hundreds of ground based transmitters
  #4  
Old February 24th 07, 10:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default Sirius and XM merger?

I guess nobody pays any attention to poor old Bendix-King any more...

Prior to the advent of XM, Bendix-King offered their own version of inflight
weather using ground-based stations.

From:
https://www3.bendixking.com/wingman/...a=sso.fis.page

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
General Aviation's first high-speed broadcast weather network makes flying
safer, easier and more enjoyable.
The nationwide system uses a network of Honeywell ground stations to uplink
a broad range of free and fee-based aeronautical data. As part of an FAA
program called Flight Information Services (FIS), Honeywell has been granted
use of two frequencies to broadcast weather throughout the United States.
Utilizing a newly designed, wholly-owned network of 150-plus ground
stations, pilots are able to receive high-resolution graphical weather
products that are updated automatically with no impact on pilot workload.

Weather is one of the leading factors cited in aviation accidents. National
aviation forums have repeatedly identified improved weather information in
the cockpit, especially in graphical form, as a key strategy for reducing
weather-related accidents.With Honeywell's Data Link Weather, General
Aviation pilots can experience a new level of situational awareness and
flight safety

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

It has only been in the last year or so that Bendix-King introduced their
KDR 610 XM reveiver....



"601XL Builder" wrDOTgiacona@suddenlinkDOTnet wrote in message
...
Blueskies wrote:
"Peter R." wrote in message

...
: On 2/22/2007 7:35:02 PM, "Blueskies" wrote:
:
: I just wonder why there is not some other source of datalinked

information available. I mean, why does this
: have to come
: in from satellites?
:
: This type of signal offers 100% coverage within the satellite's

broadcast
: "footprint." What alternative did you have in mind?
:
: --
: Peter

Like the SAS on the TV for instance, but it would be limited to the TV

range. Maybe a sideband on the VOR or upload from
the radar...





Cost of 2 sats Cost of hundreds of ground based transmitters



  #5  
Old February 25th 07, 01:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Sirius and XM merger?


"Bill Denton" wrote in message . ..
:I guess nobody pays any attention to poor old Bendix-King any more...
:
: Prior to the advent of XM, Bendix-King offered their own version of inflight
: weather using ground-based stations.
:
: From:
: https://www3.bendixking.com/wingman/...a=sso.fis.page
-----------------------------------------------
: General Aviation's first high-speed broadcast weather network makes flying
: safer, easier and more enjoyable.
: The nationwide system uses a network of Honeywell ground stations to uplink
: a broad range of free and fee-based aeronautical data. As part of an FAA
: program called Flight Information Services (FIS), Honeywell has been granted
: use of two frequencies to broadcast weather throughout the United States.
: Utilizing a newly designed, wholly-owned network of 150-plus ground
: stations, pilots are able to receive high-resolution graphical weather
: products that are updated automatically with no impact on pilot workload.
:
: Weather is one of the leading factors cited in aviation accidents. National
: aviation forums have repeatedly identified improved weather information in
: the cockpit, especially in graphical form, as a key strategy for reducing
: weather-related accidents.With Honeywell's Data Link Weather, General
: Aviation pilots can experience a new level of situational awareness and
: flight safety
:
: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
: It has only been in the last year or so that Bendix-King introduced their
: KDR 610 XM reveiver....
:
:

That is exactly what I had in mind. Odd that is does not get the press that Garmin and XM get...


  #6  
Old February 25th 07, 06:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 97
Default Sirius and XM merger?

Blueskies wrote:
"Bill Denton" wrote in message . ..
:I guess nobody pays any attention to poor old Bendix-King any more...
:
: Prior to the advent of XM, Bendix-King offered their own version of inflight
: weather using ground-based stations.
:
: From:
: https://www3.bendixking.com/wingman/...a=sso.fis.page
-----------------------------------------------
: General Aviation's first high-speed broadcast weather network makes flying
: safer, easier and more enjoyable.
: The nationwide system uses a network of Honeywell ground stations to uplink
: a broad range of free and fee-based aeronautical data. As part of an FAA
: program called Flight Information Services (FIS), Honeywell has been granted
: use of two frequencies to broadcast weather throughout the United States.
: Utilizing a newly designed, wholly-owned network of 150-plus ground
: stations, pilots are able to receive high-resolution graphical weather
: products that are updated automatically with no impact on pilot workload.
:
: Weather is one of the leading factors cited in aviation accidents. National
: aviation forums have repeatedly identified improved weather information in
: the cockpit, especially in graphical form, as a key strategy for reducing
: weather-related accidents.With Honeywell's Data Link Weather, General
: Aviation pilots can experience a new level of situational awareness and
: flight safety
:
: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
: It has only been in the last year or so that Bendix-King introduced their
: KDR 610 XM reveiver....
:
:

That is exactly what I had in mind. Odd that is does not get the press that Garmin and XM get...




It's not odd at all. It's not an open service meaning you have to use
their expensive hardware.
  #7  
Old March 2nd 07, 12:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Sirius and XM merger?


"601XL Builder" wrDOTgiacona@suddenlinkDOTnet wrote in message ...
: Blueskies wrote:
:

:
: That is exactly what I had in mind. Odd that is does not get the press that Garmin and XM get...
:
:
:
:
: It's not odd at all. It's not an open service meaning you have to use
: their expensive hardware.

Sirius and XM are both closed systems that require their expensive hardware. I was just reading in Avweek that XM has
over 800 ground stations to supplement their signals, and Sirius, because of their three '24 hour' satellites, only has
a few hundred ground stations. Neither of these systems has ever made any money, and the are making very bad business
decisions ($500 million for Stern?!).

I think it is odd that they get all this press...





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WSI weather on Sirius sat radio John Doe Piloting 2 February 8th 06 09:52 PM
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW Charlie Wolf Naval Aviation 5 May 12th 05 10:34 PM
Sirius Aviation? Recent Experiences? Carlos Reyes Home Built 6 September 25th 04 08:43 PM
XM or Sirius Radio? Jay Honeck Owning 35 June 26th 04 11:20 PM
New proposed electronics merger Jerry Wass Home Built 4 August 26th 03 01:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.