![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be cleared for a
landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to have three airplanes on the departure runway - one accelerating, one taxiing into position at the end and another (the next for take-off) taxiing into position at an intersection. Allow 1 minute for the take-off run and another for initial climbout. As for the other two airplanes, behind them is typically the departure queue blocking the quickest exit, so they will need to taxi on the runway to the next free exit before vacating the runway. That probably takes the same 2 minutes. So 2 minutes minimum. Then consider the wake turbulence, if it was a heavy taking off - do you really want to land into the wake? That might cause an emergency all by itself. Just my $0.02. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nils Rostedt writes:
One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be cleared for a landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to have three airplanes on the departure runway - one accelerating, one taxiing into position at the end and another (the next for take-off) taxiing into position at an intersection. Allow 1 minute for the take-off run and another for initial climbout. As for the other two airplanes, behind them is typically the departure queue blocking the quickest exit, so they will need to taxi on the runway to the next free exit before vacating the runway. That probably takes the same 2 minutes. So 2 minutes minimum. Then consider the wake turbulence, if it was a heavy taking off - do you really want to land into the wake? Yes, if the alternative is hitting a hillside at 200 knots. If, if, if ... there seems to be some grasping at straws here. The reality is that the PIC decides in an emergency, and ATC obeys. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nils Rostedt" wrote in message ... One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be cleared for a landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to have three airplanes on the departure runway - one accelerating, one taxiing into position at the end and another (the next for take-off) taxiing into position at an intersection. Allow 1 minute for the take-off run and another for initial climbout. As for the other two airplanes, behind them is typically the departure queue blocking the quickest exit, so they will need to taxi on the runway to the next free exit before vacating the runway. That probably takes the same 2 minutes. So 2 minutes minimum. Then consider the wake turbulence, if it was a heavy taking off - do you really want to land into the wake? That might cause an emergency all by itself. Just my $0.02. So there'd be no hurry then. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic in
the air within many miles that has to go somewhere. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... | | "Nils Rostedt" wrote in message | ... | | One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be cleared for a | landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to have three | airplanes on the departure runway - one accelerating, one taxiing into | position at the end and another (the next for take-off) taxiing into | position at an intersection. Allow 1 minute for the take-off run and | another for initial climbout. As for the other two airplanes, behind them | is typically the departure queue blocking the quickest exit, so they will | need to taxi on the runway to the next free exit before vacating the | runway. That probably takes the same 2 minutes. So 2 minutes minimum. Then | consider the wake turbulence, if it was a heavy taking off - do you really | want to land into the wake? That might cause an emergency all by itself. | Just my $0.02. | | | So there'd be no hurry then. | | | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" writes:
It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic in the air within many miles that has to go somewhere. It takes only a few seconds to divert it. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic in the air within many miles that has to go somewher They don't have to go far. One minute after a 10 degree heading they would be out of the way. Danny Deger |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace
around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors, multiple runways. It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal separation in one minute. "Danny Deger" wrote in message ... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | ... | It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic in | the air within many miles that has to go somewher | | They don't have to go far. One minute after a 10 degree heading they would | be out of the way. | | Danny Deger | | | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
neither does a 10° heading change create legal
separation in one minute. Legal separation is nice, but in an emergency, I'll settle for anything that doesn't bend metal. Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is not an option for all the other airplanes or ATC.
"Jose" wrote in message ... | neither does a 10° heading change create legal | separation in one minute. | | Legal separation is nice, but in an emergency, I'll settle for anything | that doesn't bend metal. | | Jose | -- | Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to | follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully | understands this holds the world in his hands. | for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news ![]() I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors, multiple runways. It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal separation in one minute. You don't understand how ATC works. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fuel leak or auxiliary fuel pump malfunction? | [email protected] | Owning | 7 | December 17th 06 12:57 PM |
Fuel quality control standards for aircraft rental/fuel sales... | [email protected] | Owning | 19 | January 19th 05 04:12 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Owning | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |