A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Low fuel emergency in DFW



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24th 07, 12:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Nils Rostedt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be cleared for a
landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to have three airplanes
on the departure runway - one accelerating, one taxiing into position at the
end and another (the next for take-off) taxiing into position at an
intersection. Allow 1 minute for the take-off run and another for initial
climbout. As for the other two airplanes, behind them is typically the
departure queue blocking the quickest exit, so they will need to taxi on the
runway to the next free exit before vacating the runway. That probably takes
the same 2 minutes. So 2 minutes minimum. Then consider the wake turbulence,
if it was a heavy taking off - do you really want to land into the wake?
That might cause an emergency all by itself. Just my $0.02.


  #2  
Old February 24th 07, 01:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

Nils Rostedt writes:

One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be cleared for a
landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to have three airplanes
on the departure runway - one accelerating, one taxiing into position at the
end and another (the next for take-off) taxiing into position at an
intersection. Allow 1 minute for the take-off run and another for initial
climbout. As for the other two airplanes, behind them is typically the
departure queue blocking the quickest exit, so they will need to taxi on the
runway to the next free exit before vacating the runway. That probably takes
the same 2 minutes. So 2 minutes minimum. Then consider the wake turbulence,
if it was a heavy taking off - do you really want to land into the wake?


Yes, if the alternative is hitting a hillside at 200 knots.

If, if, if ... there seems to be some grasping at straws here. The reality is
that the PIC decides in an emergency, and ATC obeys.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #3  
Old February 24th 07, 03:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW


"Nils Rostedt" wrote in message
...

One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be cleared for a
landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to have three
airplanes on the departure runway - one accelerating, one taxiing into
position at the end and another (the next for take-off) taxiing into
position at an intersection. Allow 1 minute for the take-off run and
another for initial climbout. As for the other two airplanes, behind them
is typically the departure queue blocking the quickest exit, so they will
need to taxi on the runway to the next free exit before vacating the
runway. That probably takes the same 2 minutes. So 2 minutes minimum. Then
consider the wake turbulence, if it was a heavy taking off - do you really
want to land into the wake? That might cause an emergency all by itself.
Just my $0.02.


So there'd be no hurry then.



  #4  
Old February 24th 07, 05:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic in
the air within many miles that has to go somewhere.



"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
message
nk.net...
|
| "Nils Rostedt"
wrote in message
| ...
|
| One guesstimation regarding how quickly a runway can be
cleared for a
| landing in the opposite direction. It's not uncommon to
have three
| airplanes on the departure runway - one accelerating,
one taxiing into
| position at the end and another (the next for take-off)
taxiing into
| position at an intersection. Allow 1 minute for the
take-off run and
| another for initial climbout. As for the other two
airplanes, behind them
| is typically the departure queue blocking the quickest
exit, so they will
| need to taxi on the runway to the next free exit before
vacating the
| runway. That probably takes the same 2 minutes. So 2
minutes minimum. Then
| consider the wake turbulence, if it was a heavy taking
off - do you really
| want to land into the wake? That might cause an
emergency all by itself.
| Just my $0.02.
|
|
| So there'd be no hurry then.
|
|
|


  #5  
Old February 24th 07, 07:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

"Jim Macklin" writes:

It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic in
the air within many miles that has to go somewhere.


It takes only a few seconds to divert it.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old February 24th 07, 05:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Danny Deger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
...
It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic in
the air within many miles that has to go somewher


They don't have to go far. One minute after a 10 degree heading they would
be out of the way.

Danny Deger



  #7  
Old February 24th 07, 07:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace
around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors,
multiple runways.

It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the
airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal
separation in one minute.


"Danny Deger" wrote in message
...
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| ...
| It isn't just the traffic ON the runway, but the traffic
in
| the air within many miles that has to go somewher
|
| They don't have to go far. One minute after a 10 degree
heading they would
| be out of the way.
|
| Danny Deger
|
|
|


  #8  
Old February 24th 07, 07:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 897
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

neither does a 10° heading change create legal
separation in one minute.


Legal separation is nice, but in an emergency, I'll settle for anything
that doesn't bend metal.

Jose
--
Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to
follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully
understands this holds the world in his hands.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #9  
Old February 24th 07, 08:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

That is not an option for all the other airplanes or ATC.



"Jose" wrote in message
...
| neither does a 10° heading change create legal
| separation in one minute.
|
| Legal separation is nice, but in an emergency, I'll settle
for anything
| that doesn't bend metal.
|
| Jose
| --
| Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a
deep need to
| follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob.
Whosoever fully
| understands this holds the world in his hands.
| for Email, make the obvious change in the address.


  #10  
Old February 24th 07, 10:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news

I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace
around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors,
multiple runways.

It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the
airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal
separation in one minute.


You don't understand how ATC works.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fuel leak or auxiliary fuel pump malfunction? [email protected] Owning 7 December 17th 06 12:57 PM
Fuel quality control standards for aircraft rental/fuel sales... [email protected] Owning 19 January 19th 05 04:12 AM
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve Bill Berle Home Built 0 January 26th 04 07:48 AM
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 0 January 26th 04 07:48 AM
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve Bill Berle Owning 0 January 26th 04 07:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.