A700

Juan E Jimenez wrote:

There are plenty of people who think that rushing flight tests for
marketing purposes is not a good idea.

What areas of the envelope were not sufficiently tested for the
ferry flight(s) as conducted and how did that impact safety?

Dave 'WTSOTT' Hyde

"Dave Hyde" wrote in message
...

What areas of the envelope were not sufficiently tested for the
ferry flight(s) as conducted and how did that impact safety?

http://www.adamaircraft.com/pressreleases.asp

Why don't you enlighten us on what areas of the envelope you think _were_
sufficiently tested in the _two days_ after first flight in order not to
impact safety, Dave?

Juan E Jimenez wrote:

"Dave Hyde" wrote in message
...

What areas of the envelope were not sufficiently tested for the
ferry flight(s) as conducted and how did that impact safety?

http://www.adamaircraft.com/pressreleases.asp

You're dodging the question. What areas of the envelope were
not sufficiently tested for the ferry flight(s) as conducted and
how did that impact safety? You *must* have some idea of the
envelope they'd opened prior to flying to OSH...right? So
was it sufficient for a ferry flight or not? Did they
exceed the envelope they'd cleared during the ferry? Was the
ferry flight unsafe? There are some pretty serious allegations
floating around here - I'm giving you a chance to clear them up.

Why don't you enlighten us on what areas of the envelope you think _were_
sufficiently tested in the _two days_ after first flight in order not to
impact safety, Dave?

You first, Juan...we're waiting.

Dave 'SETP points' Hyde