![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Major snippage for brevity... HMS Emperor is not listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE in any capacity. No aircraft carriers are listed. There wouldn't seem to be a need for them with thousands of land-based aircraft available. The following is provided in another post... t appears the carriers Tracker, Pursuer and Emperor were on U-boat patrol about 300 miles west of Normandy during the landings. http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 This reference is titled *DEFENSIVE MEASURES -- NEPTUNE OPERATION* and in its footnotes mentions Tracker, Pursuer, and Emperor. The document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. That does not support your position that there were no aircraft carriers. All three carriers are credited with battle honors at Normandy. -- Lynn in StLou REMOVETHIS anti-spam measure to reply |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . .. Steven P. McNicoll wrote: Major snippage for brevity... HMS Emperor is not listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE in any capacity. No aircraft carriers are listed. There wouldn't seem to be a need for them with thousands of land-based aircraft available. The following is provided in another post... t appears the carriers Tracker, Pursuer and Emperor were on U-boat patrol about 300 miles west of Normandy during the landings. http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 This reference is titled *DEFENSIVE MEASURES -- NEPTUNE OPERATION* and in its footnotes mentions Tracker, Pursuer, and Emperor. The document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. That does not support your position that there were no aircraft carriers. I didn't say there were no carriers, I said there were no carriers listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE. If you have information to the contrary please present it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Neptune All three carriers are credited with battle honors at Normandy. Can you cite an official source for that assertion? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . .. Steven P. McNicoll wrote: Major snippage for brevity... HMS Emperor is not listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE in any capacity. No aircraft carriers are listed. There wouldn't seem to be a need for them with thousands of land-based aircraft available. The following is provided in another post... t appears the carriers Tracker, Pursuer and Emperor were on U-boat patrol about 300 miles west of Normandy during the landings. http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 This reference is titled *DEFENSIVE MEASURES -- NEPTUNE OPERATION* and in its footnotes mentions Tracker, Pursuer, and Emperor. The document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. That does not support your position that there were no aircraft carriers. I didn't say there were no carriers, I said there were no carriers listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE. If you have information to the contrary please present it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Neptune http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 As stated previously, the document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. It seems rather clear that the Wikipedia list is incomplete. All three carriers are credited with battle honors at Normandy. Can you cite an official source for that assertion? As official as Wikipedia.... http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/EMPEROR.htm http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/PURSUER.htm http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/TRACKER.htm Battle honors are listed in the left sidebar. -- Lynn in StLou REMOVETHIS anti-spam measure to reply |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . .. Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . .. Steven P. McNicoll wrote: Major snippage for brevity... HMS Emperor is not listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE in any capacity. No aircraft carriers are listed. There wouldn't seem to be a need for them with thousands of land-based aircraft available. The following is provided in another post... t appears the carriers Tracker, Pursuer and Emperor were on U-boat patrol about 300 miles west of Normandy during the landings. http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 This reference is titled *DEFENSIVE MEASURES -- NEPTUNE OPERATION* and in its footnotes mentions Tracker, Pursuer, and Emperor. The document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. That does not support your position that there were no aircraft carriers. I didn't say there were no carriers, I said there were no carriers listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE. If you have information to the contrary please present it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Neptune http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 As stated previously, the document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. It seems rather clear that the Wikipedia list is incomplete. All three carriers are credited with battle honors at Normandy. Can you cite an official source for that assertion? As official as Wikipedia.... http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/EMPEROR.htm http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/PURSUER.htm http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/TRACKER.htm Battle honors are listed in the left sidebar. I think you've lost track of the subject. The issue is not where the carriers were on D-Day, but whether the Hellcat was used during the Normandy invsasion. If you accept sources that indicate the carriers were nowhere near Normandy you have to accept that their aircraft were not used during the invasion. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . .. Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . .. Steven P. McNicoll wrote: Major snippage for brevity... HMS Emperor is not listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE in any capacity. No aircraft carriers are listed. There wouldn't seem to be a need for them with thousands of land-based aircraft available. The following is provided in another post... t appears the carriers Tracker, Pursuer and Emperor were on U-boat patrol about 300 miles west of Normandy during the landings. http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 This reference is titled *DEFENSIVE MEASURES -- NEPTUNE OPERATION* and in its footnotes mentions Tracker, Pursuer, and Emperor. The document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. That does not support your position that there were no aircraft carriers. I didn't say there were no carriers, I said there were no carriers listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE. If you have information to the contrary please present it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Neptune http://www.history.navy.mil/library/...-7.htm#cn417-3 As stated previously, the document says they were part of a force provided by CinC Western Approaches to counter U-boat movement from the north. It seems rather clear that the Wikipedia list is incomplete. All three carriers are credited with battle honors at Normandy. Can you cite an official source for that assertion? As official as Wikipedia.... http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/EMPEROR.htm http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/PURSUER.htm http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive....RT/TRACKER.htm Battle honors are listed in the left sidebar. I think you've lost track of the subject. The issue is not where the carriers were on D-Day, but whether the Hellcat was used during the Normandy invsasion. If you accept sources that indicate the carriers were nowhere near Normandy you have to accept that their aircraft were not used during the invasion. Nope...never lost track. All I posted was relevant to rebutting your position that there were no carriers and hence no Hellcats. If you want to state: that their aircraft were not used OVER THE BEACHHEAD during the invasion. (BOLD inserted by me) then I can agree with you. -- Lynn in StLou REMOVETHIS anti-spam measure to reply |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . net... Nope...never lost track. All I posted was relevant to rebutting your position that there were no carriers and hence no Hellcats. If you want to state: that their aircraft were not used OVER THE BEACHHEAD during the invasion. (BOLD inserted by me) then I can agree with you. Well, since that IS what I said, it appears you DID lose track. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Lynn in StLou" wrote in message . net... Nope...never lost track. All I posted was relevant to rebutting your position that there were no carriers and hence no Hellcats. If you want to state: that their aircraft were not used OVER THE BEACHHEAD during the invasion. (BOLD inserted by me) then I can agree with you. Well, since that IS what I said, it appears you DID lose track. No, the following is what you said: I think you've lost track of the subject. The issue is not where the carriers were on D-Day, but whether the Hellcat was used during the Normandy invsasion. If you accept sources that indicate the carriers were nowhere near Normandy you have to accept that their aircraft were not used during the invasion. and MS Emperor is not listed among the participating ships of Operation NEPTUNE in any capacity. No aircraft carriers are listed. There wouldn't seem to be a need for them with thousands of land-based aircraft available. Show me where you stated over the beachhead prior to this and I will concede. Adding that phrase makes the statement correct, leaving it out makes the statement incorrect. I do not see where you made that distinction until I made it for you. -- Lynn in StLou REMOVETHIS anti-spam measure to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It's Nice Here ..... | TACAN | Aviation Photos | 102 | January 9th 07 11:40 AM |
Nice day in NA and ZA | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | December 15th 06 03:41 AM |
Nice | Dummy | Soaring | 0 | July 6th 04 07:50 AM |
Very Nice | Fil330 | General Aviation | 0 | June 10th 04 08:01 PM |
F-89 rockets fail to stop Hellcat | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 02:46 PM |