|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
September 9th 03, 07:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Jerry Springer" wrote
No.. he meant the "operating limitations" which is the bible for each individual experimental homebuilt aircraft. This is not spelled out on the airworthiness certificate. Jerry POH right? As the builder, don't you write that yourself? Eric 
|
|
#2
September 9th 03, 07:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 06:03:24 GMT, "Eric Miller"
wrote: "Jerry Springer" wrote No.. he meant the "operating limitations" which is the bible for each individual experimental homebuilt aircraft. This is not spelled out on the airworthiness certificate. Jerry POH right? As the builder, don't you write that yourself? Eric ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Nope. Operating limitations are not the POH. Barnyard BOb --
|
|
#3
September 9th 03, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Barnyard BOb --" wrote
Nope. Operating limitations are not the POH. Barnyard BOb -- Alright, I said as "part of airworthiness certificate", which is wrong. But I also said, as "specified by inspector", which is right, n'est ce pas? Eric
|
|
#4
September 9th 03, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nope. Operating limitations are not the POH. Barnyard BOb -- Alright, I said as "part of airworthiness certificate", which is wrong. But I also said, as "specified by inspector", which is right, n'est ce pas? Eric ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Me thinks... faux pas. g Barnyard BOb --
|
|
#5
September 9th 03, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Eric Miller" wrote
Alright, I said as "part of airworthiness certificate", which is wrong. It's not wrong. If you read an actual set of operating limitations, it says right at the top, in limitation #1 (as required by FAA Order 8130.2d): These operating limitations are a part of the FAA Form 8130-7, special airworthiness certificate... For rec.aviation.homebuilt, there sure seem to be a lot of people here who don't seem to own a homebuilt aircraft... Michael
|
|
#6
September 10th 03, 02:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael wrote: "Eric Miller" wrote Alright, I said as "part of airworthiness certificate", which is wrong. It's not wrong. If you read an actual set of operating limitations, it says right at the top, in limitation #1 (as required by FAA Order 8130.2d): These operating limitations are a part of the FAA Form 8130-7, special airworthiness certificate... For rec.aviation.homebuilt, there sure seem to be a lot of people here who don't seem to own a homebuilt aircraft... Michael How many and what have you built Michael? Jerry
|
|
#7
September 10th 03, 09:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jerry Springer wrote
For rec.aviation.homebuilt, there sure seem to be a lot of people here who don't seem to own a homebuilt aircraft... How many and what have you built Michael? I own, fly, and maintain an HP-11 with T-tail mod. I used to help maintain and fly a Starduster Too, before my girlfriend sold it. I am not a builder, and never claimed to be. But at least I actually own, fly, and maintain a homebuilt. Michael
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |
Hybrid Mode
