![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've sold dozens of these already and had the same responses from almost all
users.... IMHO this is the answer we should be looking for rather than adding transponders to gliders. We have an FAA exemption from requiring transponders in all gliders based on our "inability" to properly power the additional load transponders require and an exemption based on the )fact) that we don't normally fly in congested airspace and in IFR enjoinments....having said that, the FAA is acutely aware that there is a growing number or transponder equipped gliders, many of which can routinely be found running down the airways and flying near military and commercial airliners. I continually hear that "we have to fly though this heavy traffic area, this is just where we nee to go to get to the best soaring" or similar comments....the truth of the matter is, as long as we have this attitude eventually this will not be an option and this airspace will be closed to all gliders or all gliders will be required to have an maintain transponders, communicate with appropriate ATC and get permission to enter into the shrinking airspace we have come to know and open. Keeping in mind that a transponder is only truly effective when fully operational and when the pilot is in contact with ATC (and not chatting on 123.3), that still most of the aircraft you are likely to encounter may also not be in contact with ATC and will also not have sophisticated TCAS systems (ever see a C-172 with TCAS?) so your transponder is doing nothing to help avoid conflict. The TPAS or MRX system does give you a heads up and a general location for traffic in question,,more sophisticated TPAS systems can also narrow this down to range relative altitudes and relative bearing much like a TCAS system might warn larger aircraft of your position. The MRX is CHEAP...just over $400 here, simple and completely portable.it may be an excellent answer to many and may help to allow us to soar more freely for more seasons... please see : http://www.wingsandwheels.com/page4.htm respectfully Tim Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at www.wingsandwheels.com "noel56z" wrote in message oups.com... After reading of the recent mid-air out West I bought a Zaon MRX PCAS (Portable Collision Avoidance System) from Aircraft Spruce & Speciality to try out. I also fly a Piper Vagabond without an electrical system and this unit doesn't require your aircraft have a mode C transponder as it's a passive system using the Mode C readout from another airplane. The unit has a build in electronic altimeter which compares the Mode C readout of the "target" a/c and gives you a "relative" altitude difference and approxiamate range. I used it locally on the ground and observed the readout of a Piper Cherokee on downwind at the local airport..turn base and final........amazing!!! Although this unit doesn't give you a bearing to the target it does give you the altitude and range which sure gives you some warning. They have a web site http:zaonflight.com which has an online manual, etc. Noel Anderson Schweizer 1-26E |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Mara wrote:
We have an FAA exemption from requiring transponders in all gliders based on our "inability" to properly power the additional load transponders require and an exemption based on the )fact) that we don't normally fly in congested airspace and in IFR enjoinments....having said that, the FAA is acutely aware that there is a growing number or transponder equipped gliders, many of which can routinely be found running down the airways and flying near military and commercial airliners. Which gliders did even before they carried transponders - VFR airspace is where we fly. I'm told by SSA members that routinely talk to the FAA on airspace matters that the FAA is indeed "acutely aware" that more and more gliders are carrying transponders, and the FAA is very pleased about this! I continually hear that "we have to fly though this heavy traffic area, this is just where we need to go to get to the best soaring" or similar comments....the truth of the matter is, as long as we have this attitude Are these pilots flying in airspace legally? If so, and they have equipped their glider with a transponder to make their flight even safer, that seems like a great attitude. I'm not sure I really understand the rest of what Tim was suggesting, but I agree the MRX or similar unit is an excellent way to start. It will still be useful, even it you later decide a transponder is worthwhile. It may even persuade you to get a transponder, if you discover (as a few pilots have) that you are not seeing all the traffic, even after it's alerted you to the traffic. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If everyone would follow this logic that MRX is a better solution than
transponder then we would have no use for MRX... IMHO we need both. An added benefit is that your MRX will also detect other transponder equiped gliders, especially important in glider congested areas such as along ridges. You can even detect other gliders climbing in thermals nearby as well as compare your thermaling skills using the altitude and climb indicator... Speaking of the MRX, does anyone else experience a constant "ghost" target at the same altitude and within 1 mile range after some time? According to Zaon this is as a result of the MRX detecting your own transponder, which indicates a transponder issue. Ramy On Mar 7, 8:56 am, "Tim Mara" wrote: I've sold dozens of these already and had the same responses from almost all users.... IMHO this is the answer we should be looking for rather than adding transponders to gliders. We have an FAA exemption from requiring transponders in all gliders based on our "inability" to properly power the additional load transponders require and an exemption based on the )fact) that we don't normally fly in congested airspace and in IFR enjoinments....having said that, the FAA is acutely aware that there is a growing number or transponder equipped gliders, many of which can routinely be found running down the airways and flying near military and commercial airliners. I continually hear that "we have to fly though this heavy traffic area, this is just where we nee to go to get to the best soaring" or similar comments....the truth of the matter is, as long as we have this attitude eventually this will not be an option and this airspace will be closed to all gliders or all gliders will be required to have an maintain transponders, communicate with appropriate ATC and get permission to enter into the shrinking airspace we have come to know and open. Keeping in mind that a transponder is only truly effective when fully operational and when the pilot is in contact with ATC (and not chatting on 123.3), that still most of the aircraft you are likely to encounter may also not be in contact with ATC and will also not have sophisticated TCAS systems (ever see a C-172 with TCAS?) so your transponder is doing nothing to help avoid conflict. The TPAS or MRX system does give you a heads up and a general location for traffic in question,,more sophisticated TPAS systems can also narrow this down to range relative altitudes and relative bearing much like a TCAS system might warn larger aircraft of your position. The MRX is CHEAP...just over $400 here, simple and completely portable.it may be an excellent answer to many and may help to allow us to soar more freely for more seasons... please see :http://www.wingsandwheels.com/page4.htm respectfully Tim Please visit the Wings & Wheels website atwww.wingsandwheels.com "noel56z" wrote in message oups.com... After reading of the recent mid-air out West I bought a Zaon MRX PCAS (Portable Collision Avoidance System) from Aircraft Spruce & Speciality to try out. I also fly a Piper Vagabond without an electrical system and this unit doesn't require your aircraft have a mode C transponder as it's a passive system using the Mode C readout from another airplane. The unit has a build in electronic altimeter which compares the Mode C readout of the "target" a/c and gives you a "relative" altitude difference and approxiamate range. I used it locally on the ground and observed the readout of a Piper Cherokee on downwind at the local airport..turn base and final........amazing!!! Although this unit doesn't give you a bearing to the target it does give you the altitude and range which sure gives you some warning. They have a web site http:zaonflight.com which has an online manual, etc. Noel Anderson Schweizer 1-26E- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Collision Avoidance Systems | jcarlyle | Soaring | 27 | September 7th 06 03:38 AM |
Collision Avoidance and ATC | Bubba | Soaring | 5 | September 1st 06 04:31 AM |
Collision Avoidance Systems | [email protected] | Products | 0 | May 21st 06 10:15 PM |
Collision avoidance device | Jim Hendrix | Soaring | 1 | October 19th 04 09:24 AM |
Anti collision systems for gliders | Simon Waddell | Soaring | 2 | September 21st 04 08:52 AM |