![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/07/07 17:46, Roy Smith wrote:
In article . com, wrote: The Instrument rating PTS in section VI.B - (Precision approaches) says: "9. Selects, tunes, identifies, and monitors the operational status of ground and airplane navigation equipment used for the approach." So at least on checkrides you have a reference... Ed But, it doesn't say anything about listening to the morse code. Reading "IHPN" on the front panel of the radio counts as "identifies" in my book. Yes. It seems about half the people on this thread thought the question was whether or not you needed to identify the station, and not do you need to identify by listening to the morse code, or can you just read the station ID on the avionics gear. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 5:51 pm, Mark Hansen wrote:
Yes. It seems about half the people on this thread thought the question was whether or not you needed to identify the station, and not do you need to identify by listening to the morse code, or can you just read the station ID on the avionics gear. "Anyone have a reference for a requirement to identify an ils or vor prior to it's use in the USA? Secondly, is there any reference to the type of identification required? For example, would checking that the primary flight display is displaying the correct identifier suffice? Or is there a stipulation for morse code audible type of identification? Stan" Perhaps because both questions were asked. Stan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/09/07 10:27, Robert Chambers wrote:
It's the same for doing a VOR approach, do you keep the NAV button on with the ident turned to an unobtrusive level while you are shooting the approach? If the Morse code goes away it's a clue that the navaid my be unreliable. Same thing for the ILS. Well, I was told to use all my nav equipment. So, I've got both VORs tuned in, as well as the ADF, etc. That's a lot of morse code going on in the cockpit during the approach. As far at the VORs and LOCs go, the identification was to make sure you've got the correct station. The absense of the flags are supposed to tell you that it is still working. As for identifying PRIOR to use, that's a no brainer. It will get you in trouble in an instrument ride if you DON'T identify a navaid when you want to use it. Not to mention the problem you can have if you accidentally get the wrong station ;-\ -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
Not to mention the problem you can have if you accidentally get the wrong station ;-\ IIRC this happened on a corporate jet flying into a Houston Airport that was going to pick up George Bush Sr. Right approach plate but wrong frequency that used on another approach that they failed to identify. Gerald |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A-4F cockpit, sans seat | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 1 | March 2nd 07 02:13 PM |
antenna identification | Matt Whiting | Piloting | 10 | December 30th 06 03:47 AM |
Identification test | Rich S. | Home Built | 7 | June 11th 06 08:00 AM |
Does anybody know a link to a real picture of the X-43 in flight sans Pegasus or better yet a video clip of the flight? | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 0 | April 3rd 04 08:47 PM |