![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric, sorry about the typo in your name in the message above.
Figuring out the geometry is involved, but some signal overlap is OK. Explaining it in text is hard, but if you make timing diagrams on a sheet of paper and translate that to geometry, you'll see the solution. I think that if someone is in your ATC blind zone, and a TPAS interrogates your transponder and his, and he's outside of the TPAS blind zone, you'll see him. Glad you'll try to call Zaon; this coming week is one I want to forget before it even gets here! -John On Mar 10, 11:29 am, Eric Greenwell wrote: As long as they don't overlap, then maybe the unit can still pick out a potential threat. Sure, I'll try to contact them Monday. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jcarlyle wrote:
Eric, sorry about the typo in your name in the message above. Figuring out the geometry is involved, but some signal overlap is OK. Explaining it in text is hard, but if you make timing diagrams on a sheet of paper and translate that to geometry, you'll see the solution. I think that if someone is in your ATC blind zone, and a TPAS interrogates your transponder and his, and he's outside of the TPAS blind zone, you'll see him. Glad you'll try to call Zaon; this coming week is one I want to forget before it even gets here! -John On Mar 10, 11:29 am, Eric Greenwell wrote: As long as they don't overlap, then maybe the unit can still pick out a potential threat. Sure, I'll try to contact them Monday. Don't forget, there is a finite delay in the transponder (3.0 microseconds by spec) between receiving the pulse from ATC and replying. You're not looking for echoes here. -Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ZL wrote:
jcarlyle wrote: Eric, sorry about the typo in your name in the message above. Figuring out the geometry is involved, but some signal overlap is OK. Explaining it in text is hard, but if you make timing diagrams on a sheet of paper and translate that to geometry, you'll see the solution. I think that if someone is in your ATC blind zone, and a TPAS interrogates your transponder and his, and he's outside of the TPAS blind zone, you'll see him. Glad you'll try to call Zaon; this coming week is one I want to forget before it even gets here! -John On Mar 10, 11:29 am, Eric Greenwell wrote: As long as they don't overlap, then maybe the unit can still pick out a potential threat. Sure, I'll try to contact them Monday. Don't forget, there is a finite delay in the transponder (3.0 microseconds by spec) between receiving the pulse from ATC and replying. You're not looking for echoes here. -Dave never mind, doesn't matter... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monroy ADT-200 TPAS | Ramy Yanetz | Soaring | 6 | May 10th 05 09:58 AM |
TPAS experiences - good, bad, and ugly | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 1 | January 19th 05 09:49 PM |
Blind 430 | john smith | Owning | 16 | January 4th 05 07:57 PM |
FS : TPAS Sure Check model RX-110 | Brian | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 16th 04 03:21 PM |
Surecheck TPAS (was Proxalert R?) | Tim Mara | Soaring | 0 | February 10th 04 07:19 PM |