What's the pin for?

Tim writes:

too bad someone actually responded seriously.

Yes ... why interrupt sophomoric jokes with serious discussions of aviation?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes:


too bad someone actually responded seriously.


Yes ... why interrupt sophomoric jokes with serious discussions of aviation?


And your straight-faced assertions that you are a pilot (or at least
know more about piloting that real pilots) and have flown Barons and
747s are supposed to be taken seriously? What's the use in giving
straight answers to someone such as yourself. You clearly have disdain
for real flying, real pilots and real airplanes. Your world is all
about make-believe. Why not go back to Dungeouns and Dragons. I hear
flying on a dragon is nice. I know someone with 240 hours on dragons.

Tim writes:

And your straight-faced assertions that you are a pilot (or at least
know more about piloting that real pilots) and have flown Barons and
747s are supposed to be taken seriously?

Even if I made these assertions, how people might take them is irrelevant, as
the purpose of the newsgroup is to discuss aviation, not credentials (or the
lack thereof).

People who are interested in a subject can do their own research and verify
what they've been told. People who are uninterested or simply lazy depend on
credentials, and often end up incorrect as a result.

You clearly have disdain for real flying, real pilots and real airplanes.

No. I'm impatient with stupidity; my people have learned to live without it.
Unfortunately, being a real pilot does not prevent one from being stupid.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Coming from MX, this line makes me double up in laughter at the irony of
it....
"People who are interested in a subject can do their own research and verify
what they've been told. "

In a previous article, "Barney Rubble" said:
Coming from MX, this line makes me double up in laughter at the irony of
it....
"People who are interested in a subject can do their own research and verify
what they've been told. "

Man, that is a howler! How many times has that ass-clown been told that
the answers to his questions are in the AIM or the FARs or other
documents? Maybe he should do his own research!


--
Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/
"Almost any animal is capable of learning a stimulus/response association,
given enough repetition. Experimental observation suggests that this
isn't true if double-clicking is involved." -Lionel Lauer and Malcolm Ray

Paul Tomblin writes:

Man, that is a howler! How many times has that ass-clown been told that
the answers to his questions are in the AIM or the FARs or other
documents? Maybe he should do his own research!

He does.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
Paul Tomblin writes:

Man, that is a howler! How many times has that ass-clown been told that
the answers to his questions are in the AIM or the FARs or other
documents? Maybe he should do his own research!

He does.

The moment you start to do your own research, and listen to
others with experience and not argue that their statements based on their
experience is wrong, is the day the sun forgets to set.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+ycGyBkZmuMZ8L8RAl+YAKCdS2cv9SFsZXYJAElr7l ynT70/2wCeL8ZK
EKvy+xZyGaFc2s+t2F4a8+8=
=W7Cl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Paul Tomblin writes:

Man, that is a howler! How many times has that ass-clown been told that
the answers to his questions are in the AIM or the FARs or other
documents? Maybe he should do his own research!

He does.


Not going to find a lot of answers up your ass fjukkwit.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Tim writes:

And your straight-faced assertions that you are a pilot (or at least
know more about piloting that real pilots) and have flown Barons and
747s are supposed to be taken seriously?

Even if I made these assertions, how people might take them is
irrelevant, as the purpose of the newsgroup is to discuss aviation,
not credentials (or the lack thereof).

Then why do you lie about what you've done?



Bertie

"Tim" wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes:


too bad someone actually responded seriously.


Yes ... why interrupt sophomoric jokes with serious discussions of
aviation?


And your straight-faced assertions that you are a pilot (or at least know
more about piloting that real pilots) and have flown Barons and 747s are
supposed to be taken seriously? What's the use in giving straight answers
to someone such as yourself. You clearly have disdain for real flying,
real pilots and real airplanes. Your world is all about make-believe.
Why not go back to Dungeouns and Dragons. I hear flying on a dragon is
nice. I know someone with 240 hours on dragons.


Thanks for the laugh, good stuff.

------------------------------------------
DW