|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 6th 03, 03:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:03:53 +1000, David Bromage
wrote: A proposal to ground Australia's fleet of F-111 bombers would leave a dangerous gap in the country's defences, the Federal Opposition has claimed. Labor's defence spokesman Chris Evans said the F-111s provided a critically important ability to strike at an enemy force before it reached Australia. Labor's defence spokesman demonstrated that he is a not as knowledgeable as he should be, by citing the loss of the F-111 as leaving a gap in Australia's *air defence* capability.... I notice his phrasing is absent from the cited report. .... cheers, Paul Saccani, Perth, Western Australia old turkish proverb: 'He who tells the truth gets chased out of nine villages' 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IFR Flight Plan question | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | August 13th 04 12:55 AM |
| NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
| Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
| IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |
| USA Defence Budget Realities | Stop SPAM! | Military Aviation | 17 | July 9th 03 02:11 AM |
Hybrid Mode
