A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Multiple control towers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 16th 07, 10:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Hamish Reid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default Multiple control towers?

In article ,
B A R R Y wrote:

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:32:49 -0700, Hamish Reid
wrote:


My home field, Oakland (KOAK), is quite a bit smaller than DFW but it
has two completely separate towers...


Interesting...

Do you know why? Is there a terrain feature that prevents one tower
from seeing the whole field? Are the towers short?


Both towers are classic old 1960's things, and neither of them's
particularly short. And the airport's as flat as a pancake (and slightly
below sea level in many places).

It seems to be mostly history -- Oakland is basically two airports,
North Field and South Field, that are operationally and physically
linked, but have separate towers and quite separate concerns. North
Field (Runways 28R, 28L, 33, etc.) was there first (1920's), and
nowadays concentrates on GA and smaller freight; South Field (Runway
29/11) is the newer part built specifically for airlines and larger
freight operations in the 1960's, which seems to be when both towers
were built. Of course you occasionally see larger airline and freight
aircraft landing on North Field when necessary, and smaller GA aircraft
on South Field (especially for noise abatement reasons). After about
10pm, South Field tower takes over North Field operations as well. Yes,
there are some visibility issues, but nothing that would mandate two
separate towers as far as I can see (certainly South Field tower has few
problems handling me on North Field whenever I'm there late...).


Some very large Bravo airports here in the east only have one tower,
as the only folks who need to be in the cab are the controllers who
need to physically see the field. Everyone else (approach / departure
/ enroute, FSS, etc...) can be in the basement or even a different
building.


Oakland's departure and arrivals are handled by Northern California
(NorCal) Approach up in Sacramento. NorCal's precursor, Bay Approach,
used to be at Oakland on the North Field....

Hamish
  #2  
Old March 16th 07, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 517
Default Multiple control towers?

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:32:37 -0700, Hamish Reid
wrote:


Thanks for the info!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airmap 2000c: Towers, Making a copy of the SD, Taxi-ways John Mireley Piloting 3 August 20th 06 02:52 PM
Airmap 2000c: Towers, Making a copy of the SD, Taxi-ways John Mireley Owning 2 August 20th 06 02:28 PM
Non-federal towers Kyle Boatright Piloting 30 January 14th 05 01:51 AM
I hate cell towers Jay Honeck Piloting 52 June 18th 04 03:08 AM
Portable towers in FS2K4? Blue Simulators 1 February 23rd 04 11:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.