![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow thats a big vertical stabilizer. I hope its glued on better than
previous models! Aluckyguess wrote: I was flying into Van Nuys this morning IFR when ATC told us to look 11:00 and we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. I took a few pictures. http://kevinandrews.com/this_is_the_...s_superjum.htm -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "The RFI-EMI-GUY"© "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." "Follow The Money" ;-P |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
**THE-RFI-EMI-GUY** writes:
Wow thats a big vertical stabilizer. I hope its glued on better than previous models! On previous models, the stabilizer was much weaker than the rest of the aircraft. Now the entire aircraft has been weakened so that it all fails as a single unit in a coherent way. If anything, the under-strength wings will go first. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: **THE-RFI-EMI-GUY** writes: Wow thats a big vertical stabilizer. I hope its glued on better than previous models! On previous models, the stabilizer was much weaker than the rest of the aircraft. Now the entire aircraft has been weakened so that it all fails as a single unit in a coherent way. If anything, the under-strength wings will go first. wow, is there anything invovling aviation that you aren't ill informed about? Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... **THE-RFI-EMI-GUY** writes: Wow thats a big vertical stabilizer. I hope its glued on better than previous models! On previous models, the stabilizer was much weaker than the rest of the aircraft. Now the entire aircraft has been weakened so that it all fails as a single unit in a coherent way. If anything, the under-strength wings will go first. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. Any references? Really, you think they weakened the whole thing, that makes way more sense than putting additional spars in the VS. Or maybe, just maybe, they strengthened the vertical stabilizer in an effort to not repeat the past. But hey you're a idiot so who knows how you think. -------------------------------------------- DW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:
Any references? Really, you think they weakened the whole thing ... Or the Martians did it. Actually, I think the misengineered the wing, making it too weak. Who knows what else they messed up? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes: Any references? Really, you think they weakened the whole thing ... Or the Martians did it. Actually, I think the misengineered the wing, making it too weak. No, they didn't acytually. Well, maybe on your MSFS version..... Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which is easier: Boeing to Airbus, or Airbus to Boeing? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 9 | February 21st 07 01:58 AM |
[PICTURES] Soaring Pictures ! | Frederic | Soaring | 0 | November 18th 05 08:40 PM |
Airbus | Airborne | Simulators | 3 | March 4th 05 06:00 AM |
Airbus | Ace | Simulators | 0 | March 2nd 05 05:13 PM |
Airbus | Ace | Simulators | 0 | March 2nd 05 05:13 PM |