A380 Landing in LAX

Mxsmanic wrote:
Jim Stewart writes:


There was some speculation on pprune that they
may have applied reverse thrust before the nose
was firmly planted. If that was the case, a
little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming
on could cause the yaw.


If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in the
cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was an
amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no obvious
reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever).

It's only your assumption that it was a clumsy
landing.

I'm of the opinion that they did what they did
to get it firmly planted and stopped as quickly
as possible. And that's a safe landing, especially
for such a high value plane. A little roughness
weighed against the consequences of a overshoot
and nosegear collapse is a good tradeoff.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Stewart wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
Jim Stewart writes:


There was some speculation on pprune that they
may have applied reverse thrust before the nose
was firmly planted. If that was the case, a
little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming
on could cause the yaw.


If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in the
cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was an
amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no obvious
reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever).

It's only your assumption that it was a clumsy
landing.

I'm of the opinion that they did what they did
to get it firmly planted and stopped as quickly
as possible. And that's a safe landing, especially
for such a high value plane. A little roughness
weighed against the consequences of a overshoot
and nosegear collapse is a good tradeoff.

Agreed. I also should point out that the A380 was able to make
the Z highspeed, and not need the 90 that was further down at full
length. So it really wasn't a question of coming in too fast or hot,
either.

I wonder.. with 24R being one of main arrival runways, and it
also having the reverse highspeed Y (highspeed for 6L), I wonder how fast
it could turn that corner to exit the runway. It would be a sharp tight
turn, but one that could be tested, especially since there are more of
those off of 25L, and they will also be landing on the south side too.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGAwOWyBkZmuMZ8L8RAtV2AJ9Dlfg13RFBRvGhVTjnaZ A4QyG27QCfbTWg
MNgVjRxxs8Rt3oU2CvuyH5c=
=Zk41
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Jim Stewart writes:

It's only your assumption that it was a clumsy
landing.

I'm of the opinion that they did what they did
to get it firmly planted and stopped as quickly
as possible. And that's a safe landing, especially
for such a high value plane. A little roughness
weighed against the consequences of a overshoot
and nosegear collapse is a good tradeoff.

Why isn't this necessary with a 747?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.