A380 Landing in LAX

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Jim Stewart writes:

There was some speculation on pprune that they
may have applied reverse thrust before the nose
was firmly planted. If that was the case, a
little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming
on could cause the yaw.

If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in
the
cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was
an
amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no
obvious
reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever).


Says the idiot that has never landed a real plane EVER.

--------------------------------------------
DW

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:

Says the idiot that has never landed a real plane EVER.

So say quite a few pilots as well. Odd that it only engenders criticism when
I say it. I think I could say the sky is blue and someone would try to argue
with me that it is not.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:

Says the idiot that has never landed a real plane EVER.

So say quite a few pilots as well.

they have a right to, you don't


Bertie

We have to remember that mxsmanic suffers from a psychiatric problem. The
very nature of his problem results in argumentative behavior and social
isolation.

Engaging in a discourse with him rapidly will degenerate into an argument,
and he is incapable of ever acknowledging when he's wrong.

"Viperdoc" wrote in message
t...
We have to remember that mxsmanic suffers from a psychiatric problem. The
very nature of his problem results in argumentative behavior and social
isolation.

Engaging in a discourse with him rapidly will degenerate into an argument,
and he is incapable of ever acknowledging when he's wrong.




Just like my mother-in-law...

-----------------------------------------------
DW

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In rec.aviation.piloting Viperdoc wrote:
We have to remember that mxsmanic suffers from a psychiatric problem. The
very nature of his problem results in argumentative behavior and social
isolation.

Engaging in a discourse with him rapidly will degenerate into an argument,
and he is incapable of ever acknowledging when he's wrong.

Which leads me back to the Dilbert Rule:

Never argue with someone who is an idiot. They will drop you
down to their level, then beat you with experience.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGBBM/yBkZmuMZ8L8RAtTcAKCY9vJOWFvCAUYQJfm5RzeNyNMTwwCg6f ql
nj7dqfQQ9wQDy5xwJnWW0go=
=PmQQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Viperdoc" wrote in
t:

We have to remember that mxsmanic suffers from a psychiatric problem.
The very nature of his problem results in argumentative behavior and
social isolation.

Engaging in a discourse with him rapidly will degenerate into an
argument, and he is incapable of ever acknowledging when he's wrong.

Remember it? I'm counting on it.


bertie

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

they have a right to, you don't

That doesn't change the validity of the observation. If they are right, so am
I; and if I'm wrong, so are they. It's not a question of rights.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

they have a right to, you don't

That doesn't change the validity of the observation. If they are
right, so am I; and if I'm wrong, so are they. It's not a question of
rights.

Spoke like a true fraud.


Bertie

On Mar 23, 3:05 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
they have a right to, you don't

That doesn't change the validity of the observation.

yes it does.


Bertie