![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:55:40 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in . net: For your own safety and the safety of others you should just avoid Class D airspace until you upgrade your skills and knowledge. Oh, his skills are probably up to the task, but his expectations are inconsistent with regulations. He really needs to get his IFR rating. I'm not sure I understand, but didn't the controller appear to make a mistake with regard to section "2.1.2 Duty Priority" of Order 7110.65R: "Give first priority to separating aircraft and issuing safety alerts as required in this order."? There appear to be other sections of 7110.65R that may be more or less relevant to the situation, though I'm not sure to what extent or manner, if any, controllers are held responsible for complying with the instructions (or guidance?) in that Order. Also, I am not sure why a mistake by the pilot who landed ahead of Jay to promptly clear the runway necessaily excludes the possibility that the controller made mistakes. Is there some sort of exclusion principle I'm not aware of that is operative here? Lastly, I sense a claim implied here that FAR § 91.3 absolves controllers of all responsibility for consequences for their orders or lack thereof issued under the authority of § 91.123 - at least with respect to Class D VFR operations. Is that correct? If so, I can see some merit to Jay's complaint with regard to the wisdom or utility of Class D airspace. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . I'm not sure I understand, but didn't the controller appear to make a mistake with regard to section "2.1.2 Duty Priority" of Order 7110.65R: "Give first priority to separating aircraft and issuing safety alerts as required in this order."? No. There appear to be other sections of 7110.65R that may be more or less relevant to the situation, though I'm not sure to what extent or manner, if any, controllers are held responsible for complying with the instructions (or guidance?) in that Order. Please identify them. Also, I am not sure why a mistake by the pilot who landed ahead of Jay to promptly clear the runway necessaily excludes the possibility that the controller made mistakes. Is there some sort of exclusion principle I'm not aware of that is operative here? No, there just wasn't anything that suggested the controller made a mistake. Lastly, I sense a claim implied here that FAR § 91.3 absolves controllers of all responsibility for consequences for their orders or lack thereof issued under the authority of § 91.123 - at least with respect to Class D VFR operations. Is that correct? If so, I can see some merit to Jay's complaint with regard to the wisdom or utility of Class D airspace. How did you infer that? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Round Engines | john smith | Piloting | 20 | February 15th 07 03:31 AM |
induced airflow | buttman | Piloting | 3 | February 19th 06 04:36 AM |
Round Engines | Voxpopuli | Naval Aviation | 16 | May 31st 05 06:48 PM |
Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 12:18 AM |
Predicting ground effects on induced power | Marc Shorten | Soaring | 0 | October 28th 03 11:18 AM |