A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 23rd 07, 09:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft

I have had several students who owned there own A36 Bonanza.
The had lots of money and very little free time. It was my
opinion that their lack of steady lesson time was more
important than the differences in the airplanes. It might
add several hours to solo, but the practical test for the
private would still come at about the same average as
anybody else who only was able to fly an hour a week.



"Kingfish" wrote in message
ups.com...
| Total stream-of-consciousness post here...
|
| Anbody learn to fly in a high performance complex
aircraft? Bonanza,
| Saratoga, 182RG and the like? I know it's possible, just
wonder how
| much longer it'd take for a student to master something
with
| significant power and prop & gear controls. (I did all my
instructing
| in 172s and PA28s)
| I watched that goofy Segal movie Executive Decision the
other day
| where Kurt Russell was a student pilot flying a Bo, and
later used his
| stellar(?) flying skills to plant a 747 at a GA airport.
It got me
| thinking about ab initio folks learning in Cirruses
(Cirri?)
| Obviously with no prop or gear control it's a simpler
aircraft to fly
| but the performance is equal to or better than a A36.
|


  #2  
Old March 24th 07, 02:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft

I have had several students who owned there own A36 Bonanza.
The had lots of money and very little free time. It was my
opinion that their lack of steady lesson time was more
important than the differences in the airplanes. It might
add several hours to solo, but the practical test for the
private would still come at about the same average as
anybody else who only was able to fly an hour a week.


This is outside my personal experience, but anecdotal evidence suggests that
most students who are not sent by an employer are learning because they
simply want to fly. Thus, for most students, the initial ownership will not
be high performance or complex, and neither will their first move-up
aircraft. Therefore, it would make little sense to learn and then move
down.

In other words, by way of agreement, if a candidate already owns an
aircraft, then that aircraft probably makes sense as his trainer.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Primary nav source Wizard of Draws Instrument Flight Rules 17 December 21st 05 07:11 AM
Insurance out of hand? - AOPA flying clubs high perf retractable Ron Piloting 4 February 18th 05 08:40 AM
Insurance requirements out of hand? - AOPA high perf retractable for Flying Clubs ron Piloting 6 February 16th 05 03:33 AM
Need to rent an a/c for primary training Briand200 Aviation Marketplace 0 May 28th 04 04:40 PM
WTB metal mid perf. DGRTEK Soaring 2 January 26th 04 03:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.