![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Yesterday I found evidence of a larger leak than the ones we had fixed in the main tank, which were obviously just seeps. You didn't pressure test the tank when you had it out? As you may recall, the first evidence of our leak (other than a faint odor in the cabin when you first opened the door) was when Mary spotted the rubber wing-root seal hanging down, fattened and gooey from gas exposure. Isn't "fattened and gooey" a symptom of using autofuel? So, while I was under the plane cleaning out the central drain filter (the 235 has a central "pee-drain" in the belly, like the Cherokee 6), I carefully tracked down every stain. With the wing-root inspection fairings removed, and a mirror, I was able to spot a tip-tank hose fitting that showed evidence of leakage. My A&P proceeded to dislocate both his wrists getting a couple of wrenches on that fitting, and was rewarded with an easy 1/3 turn to make it tight. He is of the opinion that this was our main culprit, and that by tightening that fitting we have resolved the last of the fuel issues. The fitting tightness wasn't checked as part of the inspection process? {Was this one of the items the owner was supposed to check? :-) } |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... I'm using Torx on the plane I'm building in several access panel locations. That is SO smart. Is it illegal to subsitute Torx (or square-drive) screws in certificated aircraft? If so, why? Nope. Jim |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message ... You didn't pressure test the tank when you had it out? He never said he had the tank out. Isn't "fattened and gooey" a symptom of using autofuel? No, it is a symptom of exposing a material not intended for use with hydrocarbons to gasoline of any formulation. The fitting tightness wasn't checked as part of the inspection process? {Was this one of the items the owner was supposed to check? :-) } No, nor should it have been. Checking the torque of every fastener and fitting is not part of the inspection process. Jim |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it illegal to subsitute Torx (or square-drive) screws in
certificated aircraft? If so, why? Nope. Okay, that said, why is it that everyone (that I've seen, anyway) continues to use the (too easily strippable) Phillips screws? Inertia? Cost? No one has thought of it? No one else cares, cuz their A&Ps do all the work? It just seems so bloody obvious, yet I've never seen a certificated plane with anything but Phillips screws. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Is it illegal to subsitute Torx (or square-drive) screws in certificated aircraft? If so, why? Nope. Okay, that said, why is it that everyone (that I've seen, anyway) continues to use the (too easily strippable) Phillips screws? Inertia? Cost? No one has thought of it? No one else cares, cuz their A&Ps do all the work? It just seems so bloody obvious, yet I've never seen a certificated plane with anything but Phillips screws. Jay, I'm not sure if MilSpec Torx screws are readily available. I wouldn't have a problem using N(ational)A(erospace)P(arts)A(ssociation) torx screws on non-structural parts, but for the important bits, e.g. fuel tanks and stressed skins, I just have never seen anything that would qualify. I've been out of the maintenance arena for a few years, though, maybe they are starting to show up? Happy Flying! Scott Skylane N92054 |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably because no "airplane parts store" (including the highly respected
discounter o'them all, Chief) carries anything but Phillips. Now that you've put the bug in my ear, I'm gonna order a bag of a hundred each of the flatheads I use on the inspection plates and the pan heads/flatheads that hold on the cowling. These two are the primary offenders on The Manly HighWing 182. I'll be glad to order some for you if you tell me the thread and the length. A point or B point? Stainless or alloy? I don't go through the NAPA airplane store, but through an industrial supply company that DOES have traceable parts. I'm gonna replace stainless with stainless. They are a BIT harder and don't rust up quite as bad. Stainless to speednut has never been a problem insofar as I know. Jim "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... Is it illegal to subsitute Torx (or square-drive) screws in certificated aircraft? If so, why? Nope. Okay, that said, why is it that everyone (that I've seen, anyway) continues to use the (too easily strippable) Phillips screws? Inertia? Cost? No one has thought of it? No one else cares, cuz their A&Ps do all the work? It just seems so bloody obvious, yet I've never seen a certificated plane with anything but Phillips screws. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now that you've put the bug in my ear, I'm gonna order a bag of a hundred
each of the flatheads I use on the inspection plates and the pan heads/flatheads that hold on the cowling. These two are the primary offenders on The Manly HighWing 182. I'll be glad to order some for you if you tell me the thread and the length. A point or B point? Stainless or alloy? I don't go through the NAPA airplane store, but through an industrial supply company that DOES have traceable parts. Thanks, but I'm (hopefully) done with "screwing around" (sorry!) with the access panels on my plane for another year. I'll look into it in March '08, however. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Okay, that said, why is it that everyone (that I've seen, anyway) continues to use the (too easily strippable) Phillips screws? The one problem I've run into with internal Torx screws (on cars) is that if there is even a little bit of crud in the recess in the screw head, the correct-size bit doesn't want to fit and the next size smaller bit will feel like it fits just fine. If the screw is holding down a piece of trim you can get away with it. If there's a lot of torque on it, the too-small bit will strip out and maybe damage some of the lobes on the screw head. The two ways around this are 1) make sure the screw head is clean and 2) if you're not sure what bit a Torx screw takes, once you've found one that seems to fit, get the next bigger one and make a good effort to fit it in the screw head - don't use a hammer, but do more than just hold it near the screw head and look at it. Inertia? Yep. Cost? Yep. I think any patents on Phillips had run out long before any patents on Torx. On the other hand, you'd think if anybody would use Torx, Cessna would, because at one point or another they are/were both part of the same conglomerate, Textron. No one has thought of it? Nope. There is nothing new under the sun. No one else cares, cuz their A&Ps do all the work? Maybe some of that. I think your "average" GA pilot probably _knows_ more about turning wrenches than your "average" car driver, but that doesn't mean they actually turn the wrenches themselves. You might care more than the "average" because you're probably used to doing maintenance things around the hotel, where you have a lot of discretion on changing the design. If the nail keeps pulling out, use a wood screw. If the wood screw keeps stripping out, use a bolt and a nut. No paperwork, just your own judgement and "try it and see". One factor may be support. Every A&P is guaranteed to have regular and Phillips screwdrivers and bits. Torx may be common enough now that the bits are in all the tool chests as well, but maybe not. If you put a lot of Torx screws on your plane, it might be cheap and light insurance to carry a set of Torx bits. Personally, I think good-quality Allen (internal hex) screws are the One True Screw[tm]. The drive tool doesn't slip out. They are older, so the bits/drivers for them are more common. They are second only to slotted screws in their ability to accept improvised drive tools - this is a feature if you're trying to fix something while stranded at East Armadillo Toe International Airport and a bug if you're the _next_ guy to have to touch that fastener. Matt Roberds |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Probably because no "airplane parts store" (including the highly respected discounter o'them all, Chief) carries anything but Phillips. .stuff snipped I'm gonna replace stainless with stainless. They are a BIT harder and don't rust up quite as bad. Stainless to speednut has never been a problem insofar as I know. .other stuff snipped Now that we have broached the subject, where do you find stainless threaded speed nuts. There are a pile of them used on Cherokees to hold on the wing/stabilator tips (8-32 I believe). I have never been able to get a source. Anyone? Thanks, Mike |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My airplane (Diamond DA 40) uses stainless hex head cap screws for all
of the access plates and external fasteners. The only issue is that they are metric, but Diamond was nice enough to include a set of extras with the airplane. They are real easy to R&R, just had to get a 3mm hex bit for my electric screwdriver. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
chicago area residential airpark and maintenance facility good deals on annual inspections | [email protected] | Owning | 7 | September 15th 05 02:55 AM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Is a 152 a good start? | AliR | Piloting | 17 | April 20th 05 05:52 PM |
[US: PA/NY/NJ] Governor's Cup off to a good start | Papa3 | Soaring | 0 | April 13th 05 10:36 PM |
'Good' Annual This Year | Ben Smith | Owning | 38 | July 26th 03 05:44 AM |