![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Raven wrote:
"Pooh Bear" wrote in message ... Brash wrote: "Pooh Bear" wrote in message ... David Bromage wrote: The RAAF's 35 F-111 warplanes - Australia's front-line strategic strike force - could be retired from service from 2006, a decade earlier than originally planned, if the Government accepts a controversial option put forward by the Defence Department. A key issue is whether early retirement for the long-range F-111s could leave a gaping hole in Australia's front-line defences early next decade. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...55E601,00.html Exactly who does Australia intend 'striking' ? Ships and various targets belonging to "the enemy". I would have thought that was self-evident. And just who might "the enemy" be ? You reckon the Japs fancy having another go for sake of example ? Why shouldn't a 60's design a/c be scrapped ? Because its still better at what it does than anything else for its cost. Maybe that's so... but the task itself is obsolete. Which country does Australia reckon it needs 'front-line a/c' to defend itself from ? The one that decides it can threaten us or our interests. Do please provide a candidate list. In the unrealistic above event how would ancient F-111s perform ? Better than a JSF without in-flight refuelling. Can't say I recall seeing an F-111 perform vertical landing ! Only one of the three variants of JSF does VTOL and it's unlikely to be the variant Australia would ever buy. Heck, the ADF would probably try to fit another seat back in that lift-fan area. LOL ! Graham |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
... The Raven wrote: [snip] Better than a JSF without in-flight refuelling. Can't say I recall seeing an F-111 perform vertical landing ! Only one of the three variants of JSF does VTOL and it's unlikely to be the variant Australia would ever buy. Heck, the ADF would probably try to fit another seat back in that lift-fan area. LOL ! Don't laugh, the ADF get some bizarre ideas for "Australianising" equipment. If you can fit a big lift fan there someone will suggest a backseater............whether it's necessary or not is another thing. Just don't open the lift fans lower doors........... :-) -- The Raven http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3 ** President of the ozemail.* and uunet.* NG's ** since August 15th 2000. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The Raven" wrote in message
Don't laugh, the ADF get some bizarre ideas for "Australianising" equipment. If you can fit a big lift fan there someone will suggest a backseater............whether it's necessary or not is another thing. The Israelis have made noises about doing much the same thing, because they still regard the second seat as necessary for many missions. -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IFR Flight Plan question | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | August 13th 04 12:55 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |
USA Defence Budget Realities | Stop SPAM! | Military Aviation | 17 | July 9th 03 02:11 AM |