![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Wayne:
!,000 watts and 8 antennas is about right for state of the art 1970s to hear your own signal (but only sometimes (due to Faraday rotation) and even then very weakly. The secret to using less was to "talk" to another station with a better antenna. Today, if the other station has a gigantic antenna, stations with 100 watts and a good single boom yagi can talk to others. On occasion, hams have "borrowed" the radio telescope at Arecibo, PR. It is a 1,000 foot diameter dish with 50,000 square feet of capture area. When it was used on vhf, the other stations can use mediocre equipment and bounce signals off the moon. I have not been able to find the actual gain of Arecibo on vhf - but contacting them would not be a routine event and I question whether 60 mw would do it into a moderate antenna. Maybe on 1296 MHz or 10 GHz - but that would not meet the claimed vhf guideline. Back to the original post, there is a distinct advantage to using a 5 watt transmitter over a 10 watt transmitter when you do not have a big fan out in front of you. As a fellow pilot who routinely flies with the fan off, I use a 5 watt transmitter. If people cannot hear me, they are often too far away to be meaningful at the present moment. Colin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net,
COLIN LAMB wrote: Hi Wayne: !,000 watts and 8 antennas is about right for state of the art 1970s to hear your own signal (but only sometimes (due to Faraday rotation) and even then very weakly. The secret to using less was to "talk" to another station with a better antenna. Today, if the other station has a gigantic antenna, stations with 100 watts and a good single boom yagi can talk to others. On occasion, hams have "borrowed" the radio telescope at Arecibo, PR. It is a 1,000 foot diameter dish with 50,000 square feet of capture area. When it was used on vhf, the other stations can use mediocre equipment and bounce signals off the moon. I have not been able to find the actual gain of Arecibo on vhf - but contacting them would not be a routine event and I question whether 60 mw would do it into a moderate antenna. Maybe on 1296 MHz or 10 GHz - but that would not meet the claimed vhf guideline. Back to the original post, there is a distinct advantage to using a 5 watt transmitter over a 10 watt transmitter when you do not have a big fan out in front of you. As a fellow pilot who routinely flies with the fan off, I use a 5 watt transmitter. If people cannot hear me, they are often too far away to be meaningful at the present moment. Colin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emergency landing theoretical | gatt | Piloting | 21 | May 15th 06 03:07 PM |
Radio Range Question | Charles Wood | Piloting | 7 | September 9th 05 01:08 AM |
Radio Range Question | Charles Wood | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | September 7th 05 12:34 AM |
Theoretical best approach speed? | Pete Brown | Soaring | 0 | June 25th 04 09:22 AM |
increase range of vhf hand held radio? | ss | Piloting | 1 | December 21st 03 07:54 PM |